To us, at any society, any kind of true mind can be abstinent at executing, though necessarily, that own pretentiousness around perfectly executing in pretending to do so is definitely acknowledged by anybody, but is it so honestly correct?

Though, necessarily, how can we express our own honesty? That so honest questionable mind necessarily can be made so definitely. 

In other words, at doing everything, only pretending to be somewhat so good or kind of honest, is that so correct thing or action in terms of our own religious piety and hinesty?

Necessarily at doing everything, only honestly executing could not be that correct, but at any case, only pretending to do so honestly, that could be so appropriate, couldn't be?

In fact, as Hume ever at Philosophy own history, notional union idea was applied at our daily own perceptive mind and mutual communication, necessarily at Phenomenology, Melreau-Ponty applied those synthetic ideas into own Perceptive Phemenology. But simultaneously at our society, own mutual tacitly shaduled harmonized mind and mutually agreeable own idea must exist. 

Thus, fundamentally, to us, any unit, group belonging act and decision making must have equipped own pretentiousness so definitely.

To us, perception can be somewhat own mutually implicitly regarded own national consensus. Arbitrarily made consensus by itself can be so, naturally and necessarily. 
But to it, we either have another idea, that is what we can have sympathy to any accord, but simultaneously also antipathy to those own optimism so severely, though our mind actually is very paradoxically mutually contradictory ideas are anytime coexisting.

Thus, necessarily perception also Melreau-Ponty inquired is intentionally having ambiguous signification with not only definitely what we can believe in as our personally own perceived some identity, but also, in some necessary accord with each other as tacitly harmonized own mutual pretending, both mutually very contradictory and symmetrical ideas simultaneously realized and come to our own mind so paradoxically.

Though, if we strictly define those, we are not having any perfectly perceived own identity at least as long as we can have in mind, though consequently, to us, perfectly only illusion and perfectly perceived mind and fact are neither illusion, nevertheless, anything can be neutral, that idea is neither illusion and moreover false idea. 

And, it is unexpectedly integral, perception is certainly pretending nature accompanying thing, but synchronically it also signifies very notionally previously what we all have been at accord and with the premise, we can use our own language, at the same time of it, we can have own preception is having artificially making devise and own pretending to each other as we mutually have own consensus around any existing and present thing around our shared facts and own truth attending thing.

(Irregularly continued)

Feb. 3rd.    2024