Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

How could Regard around Precedence between Ethics and Jurisprudence? A.

Certainly, Christianity abiding moral and traditionally precious chord is what we should regard precious around contacting and dealing with each complicated case, nevertheless, in fact, our own daily reality in which we can be obliged to make use of our own daily habitual reality and accustomed reality must have been very drastically converted according to each age's own demanding with the circumstance and situation around technologically dynamically switch obliged reality e.g. around usage of terminal sort and its own technological switch and mutual very harsh gap between state of the art technology and former ages own it in old styled order. 


Christianity abiding own ethical cord and lawful common sense is certainly very precious, but simultaneously, we are constamtly facing own troubled age's situation and circumstance, in frank, to us, our own personal life spending common sense should be dynamically overturned and replaced with renewed systematic ideas and own newly replaced wisdom according to each technologically innovative progress. 


Though, in frank, actually we are obliged to turn previously seen correct habit and accustomed technology into own newly reset necessary, and the necessity is very irresistibly obliged consciousness switch, we could regard it so.


Though, consequently, to us, our own ever credibly seen reliable ethics could be made into very old style and ineffectively own malfunctioned common sense, thus necessarily we can make out and clearly analyze that ethics can be some identity which we should redress and reconsider as the object to be reformed and improved through newly fixed own daily technological progressed change. 


In other words, according to very dynamically converted technological wisdom and practical daily life mode and our own accustomed technological change necessarily will promote our own consciousness can fall under and assimilate newly technologically progressed mode into the best attached usage and habit. Those systematized change forces any jurisprudential regulation very radically to our own practical life, thus ethics could have been only formally in old common sense and ethics, in fact, at the dimension of practical daily necessary technology and idea, in honest, almost technically and practically dying mode. 


At those demanded situation given reality, we should regard our own demanding through the idea which we should make heavy of and emphasize for assimilating our own life spending mode and habit into already built up own state of the art technological demanding around switching out older habit and idea. Thus necessarily, to us, rather ethical cord as religiously precious ideas have some already useless and ineffective nature attending element. Rather than strictly compliance necessary ethics, at least at the dimension of practically reactionary consciousness switch, we should regard rather technological practical utility rather than ethics, in other words, according to each technological change, jurisprudential necessary replacement in our own reality should be regarded preceded item, though necessarily, occasionally actually, to us, rather than traditionally correctly seemed own ethical cord, we should precede newly assimilated jurisprudential necessity for assimilating our daily life accustomed reality actual situation, that case and occasion can be easily made in front of our facing daily reality. 


Those two very nature gapped reactionary switching consciousness, in fact makes us have very radically idea and habitual mode switched, that obliged and irresistible necessity can be made in our practical life. In fact, for duration of stably safe life for us, ethics traditional ideas by themselves occasionally are obliged to neglect in our own mindset, physically that necessity can be made so easily in terms of our technological life replaced reality. 


Simply, from these days on, unexpectedly easily, next mindset necessary formulation could be composed and set in our own reality.


OCCASIONRRILY, THAN OLDER ETHICS, RATHER TECHNOLOGICALLY PRACTICAL JURISPRUDENTIAL REPLACED REALITY should be REGRDED, As So NECESSARY.


At next occasion, that typical our reality example, why don't we pick up as refference, and analyze those so precisely?



(Irregularly continued)




Feb. 10th.   2024