Any conflict must never be done in rationalized idea, never yet it must originate in only emotionally near miss when both sides attempted to understand mutually, from the beginning, if only rational reasonable idea could solve all twisted matters around any different idea holder, we could solve all mutually gapped issues only using logics, mathematics and science, but nobody could force the idea that only rationally correct thought in objective preciseness can solve all slipped ideas turned into conflict and mutual hatred, originally even science, logical correctness could never guide all ones in hostility to understand mutually and never yet these things could never force all ones have trust to them absolutely, eventually all our expedient solutional things could comprise never absolute objective correctness, we only can believe in subjective mind and we can never position own mind so objectively seen thing, namely we are never the ones who can trust even and fair solution, coz any solution must make some ones dissatisfied to it in emotion, discontent must accompany us in any solution, so to speak e.g. court with the judge’s ruling.

Any fair or any even ruling must never convince both sides in conflict, coz nobody could never think enemy’s advantage nor its correctness as if we think to myself in positioned situation, enemy’s fortune is own unfortune, only it is the truth, then we can never be convinced to any even ruling coz if we regard it even, that evenness is seen to any individual as myself unfair, in other words, we could never be satisfied with anything around the conflictive matter between hostile relation’s counterpart.

In conclusion, we all can never trust nor believe in just even and just objective correct ruling by anything, even that ruling was done by Lord, if we are informed by any credibly trustworthy person, we must have skepticism to its ruler’s identity, and its ruling is never convincing nor persuasive to us so privately.

Nothing must solve all one’s discontent, hence many philosophers must have had claimed necessary to be along with reason, and many religious great holly ones must have had preached so many convincing holly ones’ affectionate whispering and words themselves, eventually we must be able to accept any sanction by objective ideas even as authentically identified publicly, because trusting and believing mind must be sustained only by our emotion to cling onto some rescuing strengthening power, and that sort of wish must be selfish so consistently and necessarily, we must never be objective to own unhappiness and misfortune although any other strangers’ them are never thought so, of course we can imagine the casualties as if their suffering must be the one we are obliged to accept, but its really imaginable understanding is just only notional it, and we could never be sad to just stranger’s misfortune and miserably occurring tragedy as long as we were staying by the one and we were witnessing the one’s suffering spots together beside the one.

All these things I mentioned is caused from that we all are just materially being to any other things with human being, we are never the ones who can be so sad just only heard things by reporting with words and explanation, its idea rising up with heard situation is just only understanding and it must never be true sadness, it must mean that we are never the ones who can be seen and truly emotionally just in heard fact or read fact even it is truly correct fact, its sad feeling must never be the same to truly spot situated nor truly sharing experiencing conditional things, just coz of it, we are just only materials in universe as physically defined, in other words, we are never metaphysical existence nor entity, in other words, we are all so spatially existing element in universe, if somebody could be in truly sad emotion when the sad incidental facts was heard to the one, the one must be the sole metaphysically being and existing Lord or so.

In other words, we are just only can be affectionate and having sympathy to the ones accompanied with or kept in close relationship, that absolute our own finiteness must be our substantially essential our disposition or sort of absolute condition, absolute our character, and because we are just so, we necessarily can have a capability to imagine all never accompanying things as if we just have a specific emotion only to the things presently we are accompanying in the really realized spot to us.

In other words, with these our very powerless cruelly necessary absolute condition must make us have thinking power and imagining sadness and affectionate motivation and just morale mentality, in other words, if we can be truly sad to things we are only heard, the one must never be with imagining nor suppositional idea swelling power, coz the one must be the one who can be absolute and it must be omnipotent coz the one must never be materialized realized one, as necessary as us, in spite of it, that sort one must be nothing but only Lord, and that possibility to be justified as convincingly absolutely credible fact ordinarily must never be present, just coz with its truth, we can believe in mutual absolute trust and absolute affectionate mutual love and really we are able to practicing and in no difficulty can execute to only beloved ones.
(to be continued)

(Feb. 7th. 2020)

Memo: This time’s analysis means the reason to be present of theology and ethics, and only its question must guide us to authentically just and absolute our credo to God. 
With just being heard, what we can be absolutely sad is the infromation to death of oure own beloved ones, but even it would be just percieved only after really confronting the ones' aspect to be dead.