All what surrounds us is nature. It includes necessarily our making artificial things.
Windy air carried through window, artificially made with fan in room, radio voice heard to my ears, are so either.

Time's slowly going makes our consciousness shifting of any change, but its ongoing shifting has no intention.

Our ears' heard many daily news-reports conveys us information through words' utterance, but its thing could be irrelevant with nature by itself, so directly the one who wants to connect them with nature is only us. That thing could never impact my residential external weather condition, just it impacts my mentality.

my mentality is not only managed by nature power, but also our human's artificial intentional transmitting messages.

In other words, we human is consistently reflected with different dimensioned mutually irrelevant things, synchronically, but each perception is completely independently irrelevant to each other, each uttely separated perceptive breflection are each invinsible resistance in subconscious awareness. these things simultaneously present but virtually these so uncertainly present together, possibly in no cxontact everlastingly but these each presence certainly we can be conscious accoridng to our mind.

What is our mind to catch all things like that?

Thus, what gathers all mutual diffrent dimensioned things is all our own body separated with each other in any society, and its holding mind. Mind makes consciousness to own body, but physically certainly body sustains our mind, so correctly.

Our brain just analyzes each distinct perceived thing, but each thing's character is completely irrelevant with my brain's synthesis.

Eventually, each perceptive acceptance means either nature's function. Each shape each character has no intention by itself.
The one who wants to interpret each thing is just only our own mind in synthesis.  And we even can give them all meaning and each particular analysis, that matter would make me and my mind even parody in interpretation.

That truth must be caused from our brain's working, centainly either it could be one of nature , but its nature character is very exceptional.

In other words, our perceiving each nature has np parody, eventually its parody reading must depend on only our brain's working.

Thus, we can say that we always unconsciously cross our own idea to all perceptive whole images and nature itself.

That fact would evidence that only our brain can freely explain or interpret every perceptive image, that function would have been sustained by our human sharing words' meaning, that systematic understanding must have own regulatory functional whole synthesis in each language as syntax or so accompanying unexceptionally.

Meaning must interact with each concept, that interaction must make us feel something so dubious, at another case, so trustworthy, thereby, sometimes we should wipe out all excessively distorted or so biassed imagination, presumption, assumption, suppostion, at something we are noticed to, possibly only absence from the beginning could be  cognitive, that case must never be so rare, in our brain ideas. Because, these unnecessary fantasy frequently makes us parody in our own brain!

Because, if we try to look at everything, listen to everything, I can feel I could recover nature itself, which tells me so naturally as it does and is to me.

Why don't we perceive all thing, eliminating unnecessary knowledge, and information!

If we do so, nature itself would make us an appearance as it has originally as it is!

We could never block flood of information, then we have no choice but keeping company with it, so well, for dealing with it, we should devorse all each diffrent dimensioned thing, nas each is, it'd be littel bit split of feiled green and unseen radio wave and additionally now new crona virus, the news about it would be now clazy contemporary world's weather forecast or so. Each perfectly devorsed thing could never be synthecized at one own sensation. Then leave them each alone, however nature itself has no parody, if we regard all these things as discerned each of them, just it must be only us, nature itself must be non-charant to these facts. Then only one question must be left to us, that is "Who are us?" (to be continued)

( July.3rd., 7th. 2020)