Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Triplism's Suggestion Part4

Now if we suppose that a young man as twenty-five years old has a hope to survive at least 80 years old, never yet if it was possible, even 100years old, he wanted to survive.
But actually his survival length could not be guaranteed with scheduled longevity. In other words, human's life span is not so precisely programmed thing, necessarily very roughly almost length could be to some extent programmed with DNA sequence, but really we can keep our own life with some fruit by effort at extending will or hope. Namely it is not precisely programmed, but it must be programmed to make us not having ten thousands years at survival, but possibly al least one hundred years at life span, with general our scientific comonsense.


Meanwhile, if we could never explicate the whole aspect or modus ponens at π(pi), that thing must never be like our own life span as length of years. Number must be previsouly decided whole sytem, then that thing must never be like our mind, because our mind must be impacted by very many things with accidentally occuring and each occasional our own constitution and mind mood and emotion. Then eventually these each very different conditioned mind must never be ge neralized not taking account of each person's internally necessary situation or condition each one has necessarily according to each external condition.


Hence, on the contrary, number thing must be our regulatory set very especial exisntence to us. In other words, it means that the reason which we each are holding very particular conditioned life and each moment's circumstance, then each one has each distinct reaction to externally occuring thing, then nevertheless for keeping social order, we must have another absolutely unchangeable standard to keep us have consensus, that objected tool is language with consept and meaning anybody could have consensus to seen the meaning of messeage delivering tool, and either number is the same thing, and it must be so especially se thing for us to know plainly objective index.


Then, necessarily and consequently we must be able to judge that number must never be taken it into account our surviving time's shifting and replacing date next to next, it means unchangeable never moved index, then it must be transcendent beyond time shifting accompanying change at nature or our surviving world, then number must be one of the very distinctive universally fixed system. And why we have used it must be caused from that our surviving world is just not consistent state offering thing as anytime only shifting sisutation can surround us, then we need absolutely indicating scale or so as to be unchangeblly universal beyond any circumstance changing, then necessarily number was discovered by human-beings. 


To some extent, probably the truth as next must exist at our nature as human character and our cognitive commonsense, that is, to unchangeble matter, we for our mind's neccesary demand rather anytime quickly changeable things like stock indicators, pop music scene's world trend or national trend as fassionable demand's shifting, our habitually customized all items and working memory's necessity with commodities mode updating and change, with password replacing habit and implict regulation, in other words, all our dutiful, obligatory things and our leisure items or contents are all belonging to only changeable instantly fixed modes, why we are using these updating consistently changeable items and contents must be caused from, in terms of our survival truth that e.g. we must be mortal, immortal survival or so must never be ours. If we have perfection to get only immortality, we could have never wanted to own very quicly shifting and only changeable items or habit, necessarily we could have been so like stones or minerals. Of course, it is just my idea as very simple presumption or imagination, because I have no idea that kind of world as you probably are at the same circumstance at having an idea toward that suppositive world presence as that we all are immportal.
Former precisely narrated contents must be relevant with parameter's principle, you see.


Principly, number is never changeable at this nature, and with the absolute nature, it must never connect nor interact with natural selection. Then mathematics' fundamental idea or kind of law as necessity must be dependent on only premise which could never concern time accompany transiting phenomenon, and connect with consistent transiting systme, then it must be transcendent to time, beyond all change.
That fact must originate in our world as nature and us must be changeable at showing state and condition with many infinite factors, then to very mortal phenomenal gross, as parameter we could use so universally absolutely never changeable indicator, then it must be our known mathematics using number, then ver many mathmaticians virious kinds of theory must be reasoned or dispositioned for indicating or suggesting to us as hypothesis as unknown nor not explicated so completely.


At mathematics, imaginary number must be created with necessity to caluculate and output precise all indicators as procedural neccesity. But irrational number must be previously fixed at nature in terms of mathematics. Two very diffrent typed of numbers must exist, and our ancestors had discovered them so earlier.
Of course, otherwise, between imaginary number and irrational number, possibly some kind of mutually ver close relation or our unknown regulation, and just we have never discovered, then, posibly yet discovered so deepened relation or relevance could have been exixted, but so far, we are never known to it, we can judge to our reality around mathematics.


Just these all aspects could never be completely elucidated nor figured out to well known fact. And just both things could be managed only with all aspect solution in only uncertainty.


Then, numbers' presence could be not only our discovering very artificial interpreting tool or tools or method, otherwise, these are either nature's nature thing, we could say, then circle of mathmetics, even now has both intuitionism systemetized by L. E. J. Brouwer and formalism systemetized by David Hilbert. but either there, possibly we just have never known to it, kind of somewhat to make us convince the absolute truth around mathematics as being beyond 
these both intuitionism and formalism as dualism driving order, e.f. as I claim at this essay series for suggesting triplism might have been present originally, but just now either I have no idea to that domain with certain evidencing method. 


Just as what I want to claim here, we have certainly an expedient interpretation around using regulatorily and habitually dualism, we must have a nature to apt to discover dual mutually contrary truth or facts in nature or our making system. That must be our judging nature or disposition of spending our intellect for whole mathmatics’ or any other nature mechanism in analyzing all things, presumably we by nature have that way through possibly with men and women, we all have two eyes, two pores in the nose, ears, hands, lungs, testis, overies, feet, each right and left fingers at hands and feet.
In other words, we have usually and essentially by nature have two very charatertized differed items as notion and concept in analysis and methodizing procedure for embodiment our next objective target in terms of datam outputting occasion, in a conditon to be managed with dualism, only that truth could be confirmed now for the present.


Let us get back to original issues. With these mentioned matters, however, consistently we can know not outputted ongoing jobs process which could never be regarded + nor -, then consistently we can know that even if we are accompanied with + and -, we anytime must be along with unidentified outputted number in anticipation and expectation with our knowlegeable numbers not as well as past done data. That must never be + nor -.
Because we anytime are at opened to unidentified or not outputted state so essentially, and that must be time's or time travelors' as us accompanying own nature. 


With anytime memory to ther past and data, recorded itmes in knowledge, these all so fixed and never changeable items and synchronically our mind consistently have either perfectly unidentified future's prospect with data which could be gotten to us as future's presumption, in other words, half fixed as never changeable and half completely unidentified and unpresumable to us, both mentality and awareness are held at our mind.


Then, if we define for the present, as I previously told, + as date fixed and believablly trustworthy in terms of our past doing and achieved content, and - unfixed and unidentified to be submitted to us in future, but simlutaneously perfectly admittable truth to us must be what we are all at now and that not plus nor not minus as zero, that cognition must be regulated, nevertheless now must be perfectly mortal just soon disappears, then just our absolute fact as our daiy unchangeable truth must be only chasing now, chasing only now, that our act's nature must be outstanding to us in this debate. That is at one degree of definitive truth, shifting as well as slider rule of now's position at time scale. 


That must mean never normal + nor normal -, then it must be absolute premise as our observers' view's presence. Then to some extent, our life must be discribed with simple diagram like next.
                                                                    
                   〇ΙΙ◎Ι◉


Left empty circle〇 is perfectly now absence but existing at our own record, memory, and doubled vertical lines ΙΙ means that we could never go back nor head for, and sebsequent ◎means anytime held now by us, but its point on time must be shifted, next one vertical line Ι means not now, but its moment must be coming to us, sometime, and anytime with next moment, and last ◉ is our forwardly lasting future unless we all are never dying at a strech together. 


This diagram's system could suppositively so true, we could get one not dualism dependent another system, for the present, you see. And it is if we could be permitted to apply the unchangeable mathematics' number system, not even number and only odd number could be drawn to the suppositive system and number must have the symmetrical quantity of both side, as well as,


                                                                 〇🔴〇
                    〇〇🔴〇〇


If we define suppositively now, these odd number's echelon must be one so certain model for understanding these serially debated matters at now this paper sentences.
In other words, only odd number could express our really confirmable reality and our world's truth and nevertheless number thing must be very abstract and never be changed so atrificially in terms of nature, that placsticity as nature which could drive our mentality and spirit to be aware of not devided so easily as in order of Integer Sequences.


In other words, at least in integer, only odd number must be stably existing, because the side of even number could be easily divided and become the reason to be hostile mutually with both sides, presumably at Christianity, only odd number could have regarded so stable, then our great ancestors must have had thought the ethical absolute order as trinity. Additionally, in Russia, at celebrating occasion, presented bouquet or flower's number must be usually in terms of evading jinx, only odd number must be uses at presenting to the one in question to be celebrated. 
(to be continued)


Jan. 9th. 2021


Additional note for next debate; Ultimately only undivided thing could be the trigger to make next phase because our reality must be dependent only on not solutive, only consistent incompletion must manage our reality and our mind holding state disposition. For understanding its truth, CP violation、CP-symmetry、charge conjugation parity symmetry by Makoto Kobayashi (physicist) and Toshihide Maskawa (or Masukawa), two sirs theory of this could drive our understanding to just now as very exceptional issue or cognition, because our presence or existing awareness must be sustained with center ◎as consistently made transitive state it as CP violation's typical our known thing in real world already operated by universal law or system at nature world.
 
To that reality only odd number must be so appropriate, and only with them we could easily formulate our reality with already done past and now as present and future unrealized condition. 
Then, to some extent, number thing must have that universal this our world's absolute truth, then it must never be just only our expediently set formula, it either must be the one absolute configulated item in nature. As its presence in this world as nature, any kind of species are regulated at this mathematics' law with birds, insects, or anything.