Economics various methods mean conversion for relating dependent understanding with algibra. It has no spatial element. Necessarily, it relies on currency's nature.

Meanwhile, algibraic evidencing means so spatial restriction, then it means bodily concretely embodied physical drawing act and its nature holding picturing.

In other words, at this gap, obviously algibraic cognition must be so abstract and so, transition from one dimention to another it.

Nevertheless, at analytical philosophy, our sentences could be analyzed at intention, object, speaker or writer's position at conversation and description.

These recogniton and conceptual analysis with each conceptually corresponding daily act at factual understanding means arbitrary discernment for understanding our langage activity's signification.

At analytical philosophy, obviously, description and moralistic aspect must be distinguished. Because it tends to analyze all so objectively. Because at analytical philosophy, all our act could be analyzed with introspective view, then it must never be the same with phenomenology. Because latter means so the present progressive form, in other words, analytical philosophy intends to analyze our act and language activity as truth, but phenomenology intends to analyze them as existence, or means so being.  
  
These very tough crevasse is laid between these two differentiated philosophy's manner and behavior. But this gap unexpectedly resembles mathematics two methods with algibra and geometry.
Necessarily, algibra could react analytical philosophy and geometry could react phenomenology.

But probably analytical philosophy's excluding stance to moralistic view by its nature must be its own moral.

In other words, analytical philosophy must exclude any subjectivity, then it mimics God's view implicitly. 
Meantime, phenomenology must take subjectivity. Because its stance and actuation must be caused from kind of skepticism to generally believed God's presence's universality 
Then phenomenology tends to take back Mosaic law or Torah. 

But phenomenology accompanying time's interpretation includes Parmenides's paradox.☆1 It means that time must delete any now and at each moment all accumulated pasts are deleted and regenerated, that everlsting switchable duration means time.

That view means only admitting not present of specifically symbolized God as theism.
Then, to some extent, phenomenological view means so Greek universality, and either atheism.☆2

Meanwhile, analytical phisophy at ethical view, obviously theistic viewpoint could be present, then with its nature, only so definitely fair look to everything could be justice as specific ethical matter.  
Then, not as well as phenomenology, it adopts only objective (then, very introspective view applying) view.
Then, it could be transcendent to anything, with its mdthod, analytical philosophy could delete now's privilege, on the other hbnd, phenomenology persists in now.

In accordance with these, phenomenology adopts only subjective view, then it relies on kind of running toward it, analytical philosophy has only all stopped time as perfection of time scale's concept, otherwise as measurable scale.

Then, its stance must be the truth. And phenomenology's stance is being's aspect's picturing.

Then, phenomenological view adopts more practicing changeable modus ponens, on the other hand, analytical philosophy adopts unchangeable absolute truth could be entirely applicable to algibraic cognition, phenomenology could be easily applicable to physics, partially geometrical method. (to be continued)

Apr. 12, 19th.  2021

Memorandum; Analytical philosophy dealing "now" means so date's cut, or stopped it, but phenomenology doing it means rather arbitrarily regarded length as easily replaceable extent, because, it is so practical, toward analytical philosophy's notionally regarded. 

In other words, phenomenology's regarding now could be regarded as so active, than analytical philosophy as so destined and set so fixedly, by God.

Parmenides's paradox.☆1

atheism.☆2