To be frank, analytiacal philosophers' interpretation in methods the analytical philosophers makes me a little bit bored, and fed up with to it.

Because at least to me, words meaning in analysis with logical thinking by itself is seemed barren, its idea is caused from my idea that all their stances and methodizing mechanism could be transformed method of rhetorics many great thinkers had addressed with.

And, additionally, at one words' sentence in serially shown meaning is what we should regard and take the one's outputting indwelling true idea into account of analyzing to meaning and its intending identity.

With these regards, for the first time, we could interpret one opinion and the truly shown aspect of the message telling one's mind.

And its essence must raly on the one's own view around life and death.

In other words, one person's view around life and death must covince the one's outputting words as mentioned thing by the one.

And contrarily,  mechanism could never be set, at least to my idea. Nothing could be so integral but it.

In other words, how the one could have own view around life and death must convince us as the second person or third one to the one.

This time's the most integral and vital thing is all like these, at next chance to debating, let's give us contemplating around religeously motivated mentionings' identity.

(to be continued)

May.  3rd.   2021