Why we have daringly objective view in daily life must be caused from that we usually have so many errors and false, and our own view could head for according to only what our mind wants to view to our reality.

In other words, as our own nature, we all are very selfishly having own prejudice, but simultaneously we all have another mind that our own that selfishly whimsical disposition should be noticed and constantly revised or we should reform our mindset.

Thereby, we as human-being have history to be accompanying us with introspective ideas as philosophy or so.

In other words, we have consistently both two mutually contradictory dispositions, then also heavy trial or failure at doing so and very honestly sincere modesty in mind.

These two very symmetrical dispositional ideas could be easily held at our mind.

That must be very our own feature as human nature.

By the way, Paul Recoer regards these matters through next principle. ❇️He interprets relevance of moral and ethics as former means already mentioned sentences claiming content as what we are prone to have selfishly viewing according to very instantly arbitrary aspect at assessing all things, then to its thing's remorsefully react, that very inherently kept our mindset could mean so externally we all are obliged forced with teaching and given lesson, instruction, moral things are generally all so, as what we are told by conventionally public ideas, but if we can have upper degree mindset as our acting criterha so ethically meant mind, the kind of ideas must be more subjectively positive spontainity, and more according to evaluation to ourselves, not respect to ourselves, because latter criterion must be self addiction.

That so intrinsically positive and subjective mind stance could be regarded as ethical view.

With these premises, we'd have some reliable index, around our accompanying reality to auxiliary verbs.

And if we follow Ricoer's theory as applicable data, trustworthy contents and useful idea.

Consequently, "should" could be just for moraristic our regulatory code, or told instructional lesson, at the first stage of our life we met taboo told by adult ones.

Meanwhile, "can", "might", "need", or so must be relevant with ethically subjective meaning.

Those could contacting possiblity, however former "should" could be applied either to our own mind.

The latter cases must be our own spontainity driven mind as ethics could apply.

But to other one but us as "myself", these relations could overturn, mutually, necessarily it is caused from to other one, we apply concession and respect, to us, humbleness, and modesty.

That upset reality evidences that we consistently discern own thing and other one's thing, so autonomously.

In other words, these serially taken mind's procedure means our conversation's essence. These moral and ethical problematic matters deal at our mind must evidence our inherently social responsible mind and concessional respect taken to other one, and our own subjective instructive mind to us, as "myself".

If we try to analyze our usage of auxiliary verbs.

We'd for the present these analysises, so consequently. (to be continued)

Aug.  5th.    2021

❇️SOI-MÊME COMME UN AUTRE ©️1990