〇Since the earth was born, 4.5billion years has passed already, and since the universe was born, 18.5 billion years has done, actually when we say “we”, we always discern both with terrestrial as inner parts of this earth which means human-beings and our own earth environment and extra-terrestrial as outside of the earth.
But we as all human-being are really surrounded by any creature except us or species of any those and so many materials like mineral, we as human are just only the incidental fact as 6 million years only had been given to us, as the evolution of species, so shortened history in terms of biology.
But toward natural scientific history along the earth historical view and our own ethical history, we exactly discern and if we debate in time scale as the criterion to each thing, both are so utterly different to each other, with outstandingly different character. Ethical human history is obviously the matter or an item which we must regard it as the proposition how we have had thought in religion history and our own belief around it, as the aspect of our brain idea indwelling facts’ history.

〇But as so grave matter to us, I’ve already mentioned, but at Buddhism in an example of priests of Tendai sect of Kyoto Sanzen-in as Buddhist would explain that our carnal must repeat the same characteristic ages, everlastingly, according to what goes around comes back around, as cause and result in repetition, but nowadays, we have an absolute fact that any whole-over war had become so abstained from being practiced to us, it has had no longer done so easily, as its example we are all shown, the bigger change was done to us all, so absolutely. For instance, Japanese people’s averaged life span was at the epoch since Meiji-era to the first term of Showa-era, male person was 24 years, female was 36years. But at Johmon-era, male sex person’s it was near 36years, then so consistently had length changes, they had, but despite of it, what male sex persons’ it has had been shorter than female ones’ it anytime, that fact was so universal to these data.
Thus, what to be changed is only absolute value as the number, but relative it is the one which has had never been so changed, and if we are careful only to it, Buddhistic transmigration or metempsychosis would be the ones which we must discover the truth.
But for example, all species of the creature of this earth in history of 3.6billion years, DNA’s organized structure had never been changed completely by itself as ATGC. Exactly, for several ten trillion years must had even those so changed excessively, but before it would be done, the earth itself must be vanished with the universe, before it would be so, creature itself must be exterminated so completely, as the appropriate possibility inference.
However, we can infer that mathematical axiom must never be changed. But possibly, even it might have been changed, coz we just believe in or trust that we just under our actual and real order of our own creature then we can trust or believe in it, as we’ve and we’d done, we could say it either.
But if simultaneously after several billion years we would suffer from the earth extreme environmental change as universal leveled materials’ change would be accompanied with us, along this fact, our human-beings’ brain thinking system itself would be overwhelmingly changed so much according to order, the possibility which mathematical axiom itself must be possible, it could never be said impossible for the present. Even if that kind of situation was invited to us, our human-beings as a specie was never be extirpated, utterly, then what we would be forcibly changed into completely another common sense which must be accustomed with our daily life situation, would never be impossible to us as now our inference.
According to that kind of sequel if we had in our future, never changeable valuable view was thought in long duration of our surviving span, with taking account of our human-beings’ survival and creature species’ it either, substantially, all beings in change as the absolute does never mean so much in all species’ changing aspect. In other words, beneficial natural scientific standpoint urging the criterion common sensible long spanned change, for example mathematics’ progress, or our consciousness change toward it was never possible, that mention was never so appropriate to probability we would output around that problem. Otherwise, that time would be possible to make us switch our theological idea, still now we could say so, prophesying our far future, so imaginable to us, either.
Namely, ethical things are never so meta-physical with which we would be driven to our own Ontological cognition, we could judge.

〇Ethics are eventually never ratification. Paraphrasing it, factual relation as if the scientific data outputting, or so as to say, reasonably explained irrelevance between human-beings and materials would be nothing to do with us, so much in different dimensioned things.
As far as concerned to Christianity, Jean Calvin was narrating at his Institute of the Christian Religion in Modern English, the Book 1 The Knowledge of God the Creator, Chapter 13 trinity,
（omitting）Essence or a part or a member to be supposed, its Hypostasis’ discerning concern is never efficient, but moreover, this Hypostasis is in no essence and either never present except outside of this essence, (omitting preface) Father is never God in supposition, Father is never able to be so, his son either, according to what he was God, thus he could never be able to be the son, (omitting preface) infinitely limited in meaning, if we say divinity, it means that itself must rely on what itself must be possible to be only with the absolute fact that He was God. With its fact, the Son is either God, in terms of its view, He must be present, that confession we must admit that we must confess. But in terms of Hypostasis, it could be distinguished, finally. As far as concerned that He is the Son, its truth must be caused from His Father., (omitting preface) His essence has no origin. But His Hypostasis’s beginning is by itself absolutely God itself., (omitting preface) On behalf of Father’s Hypostasis, there must be present of essence, Essence, The Son, The Holly Ghost, these three entities are the thing with which could be evidence in our demand to gather three them all, coz its trial must make essence of the Son and the Holly Ghost in Essence, it must be the obvious fact. If we don’t try to do so, each the sole part was fused to the ambiguous one and its essence was vanished sometime. Then any distinctive recognition was fallen into being false. (preface omitted) Father as we say is the synonym, then Father is the One who must be the same of thing to bear the God, in the Son only shadow would be left, nothing was able to be present but Trinity itself must be joint of the Sole God and Two Created.
At upper narration, Calvin was trying to predicate at least that Trinity must be explicated as self-identification of God Himself, so well. Probably at 20 century’s all stream from Logical Positivism to analytical philosophy, not to mentioned Frege, Tarski in tautology, Nelson Goodman, Willard van Orman Quine, David Lewis, this final truth as Trinity was based on these as the sole advocator to make its self-identity odd reason, the necessity to make them each independent by Each Itself. This kind of Hegel’s sublation including any philosophies is caused from Theology, it must be the flawless truth.
Christianity theologists necessarily regards Trinity as the most important doctrine. It urges us to imagine that linguists are apt to analyze languages with syntactical structure, with exemplification in verbs and object and complement in conjugative switching or not toward any languages exist beyond 8000, but philosophers or logicians are apt to do so with adjective’s analysis (with Wilfrid Sellars, or Christopher Kennedy), so as to say that kind of viewed noticing focus is accompanied with them in distinguished opinion, developed to human-beings’ totaled history in notice, in other words, often being apt to be changed, and its repetitious universal tendency and whether we should evaluate moreover between trendy repetitious change or substantial organizing characteristic change as the absolute, in two differentiated stances, we could find out in our own human history, that view was discovered at this time claim, I want anybody to read these sentences to understand so enough.
And moreover, so important thing is despite of our recognition that toward natural scientific absolute number’s shifting, we must neglect any absolute number data in religious creed stance, despite of that behavior which is intended to evaluate pragmatic importance, but its decisive stance as religious theological manner was already set as the dual method with another natural scientific data referring stance. It means pantheistic species’ diverse co-existence or symbiosis urging relative similarity in noticed manner, and or to say either that unchangeable consistent irrelevance in our sure belief is not to mention of it, of course biological simple creed, but simultaneously probably theological physics or mathematics have had adopted since so old days of human-beings, as being evidenced. Because these are based on axiom narration as the standard manner. (to be continued)

Memorandum; At any priests of Buddhism, universally contemporary political scenes have showed us in conservative ideas and liberal ideas repetitiously appear, in Japan’s history, Sengoku period had repetition with political unification and disorderly war repetition, we could evidence an universal character in historical researches.

Upped at another blog at Mar. 2019, re-upped at this site at Oct. 12th.     2021