According to Part1's claim, we'd regard our usage of adjective as what we can have presence as time term is caused from our sharably confirmable past according to common memory around what we'd stepped until today's now present time.

In other words, including "a" and "the" as usage interpreted with our consensus which is dragged with our memory, any discernement toward each word as a vocabulary is composed with our generalized acknowledgeable usage and our idea around which it could be trustworthy or not.

That interpreted factual truth could be applied either to what we interpret the meaning by itself given to one word, that applicable range is possibly to cover any part of speech, e.g. the verb "articulate" means originally making something so clear, or clearized, that applicable range necessarily from the beginning the usage of pronunciation at spoken words, then it necessarily attends the behavior or attitude of us when we say something, in other words, that word necessarily shows our mind's not hesitant and fixed and not holding procrastinating aspect, then at adjective, verb. Not only these but also its word means as a verb either "(use passive) to form a joint or connect sth by joint with sth (variable pitch,verb neutral power).
If the last article means diverged context procreating another but relevantly familliar meaning, we could interpret that each meaning must be mutually relevant with each shared elemental unit and with some accidental usage, we can easily have consensus at taking one word as another given meaning as associable range sharing dragging.

Former serially mentioned things could make us have association with that we can have certain mamory around relatively so close past specifically at the case the memory sharable ones are still present even they are so older.
In other words, what we should regard formally acknowledged orthdox otherwise substream must rely on our commonly confirmable record or our definitely unforgotten memory.
The last mentioned example must be applied eeither to archtecture mode, artists' art masterpieces mode with Impressionism, Art Deco, Art Nouveau, Fauvism, Expressionism, Cubism or so. Either any kind of literature mode, ism, and music genre's it could be done too.
E.g. the issue who was the inventor as first suggesting one could be held back so far, at least in terms of the level of professional work, releasing projective 20 century's music record business world had back reverse recording applied work which was for the first time made by the Beatles.

Otherwise, at the extent of hugely everlasting level, this our earth history must become absolutely forgotten fact at extremely further future of this universe as galaxy surrounded by others.

At the matter of fact, meaning's applicable usage's extention means our generally regareded correct or appropriate consensus.

Taking into all those interpreted and inspected mentioned things, let us once give the summary there.

At very basic level, we could regard as all adjective's prototype, article could be submitted there.

At generally regarded level, we has two typed each one word,
as 

🌟Echelon1
    
      ”a"
     and
     "the"

These submission could be analyzed like next.

🌟Eshelon2

✳"the" is specifically used for indicated matter and thing.   ✡DEFINITE ARTICLE

　Meantime, 

✳"a" is so used for arbitrarily indicated somewhat in a group(as set theory's regard) or its belonging fact reality.   ✡INDIFINITE ARTICLE

By the way, at least in terms of our daily usage, we could interpret that both two echelon arrangements as each alloted intepreting.

Adjective's kind must be analyzed at each category at least at daily usage.

"the" →　very generally used for intrinsically necessity for  Minimal Survival

"a"　→　very subjectively used for extrisically necessity for Subjective Survival

Though, necessarily, "the" means for each user, so conceretely explainable approaching reality necessarily is driven, then that usage means our mind's recognition around familiarity in confirmable daily reality.
Toward it, "a" means for only very detached and abstractly interpreted specified usage, thus, its used case is very specified according to the degree "the" usage is completed at stably communicative basic fundation set at each conversation partner, with these premising complition or so, for the first time, "a" 's usage could be seen so natural or appropriate.

As its proof, when we lost them correct route to the destination when we personally at holiday or so, walking, we necessarily visit tourist information center or police station, city hall or so. Otherwise, when we climb a high mountain with entangled routes network for climbing top of it, to other mountain climber or so as another visitor. And that case, we usually use “the” as being for emergently deal for survival for the present at the day’s matter.

Meanwhile, "a" is defenitely used for so abstractly committed and so privately deepened levelled approach, thus, ordinarily, we don't use the dimentional conversation to the one who met together for the first time as mutually just only stranger at any road or business concern buliding or so in the city or, even at rural zone, we to the one who met for the first time unless we inform the one that one corpse as somebody is laid at the placen over there, we usually use only directly indicatively versatile "the", and directly to the stranger, "a" used expression is ordinarily abstained from using.

Ultimattely,

"the" means directly indicative definite article

toward it, 

"a" means indirectly indicative indefinite article

Though, necessarily, to "the" we can have an idea that it is so general at least at a context of conversation. Meanwhile, to "a" we can so it that it is so stepped, more deepened adavanced levelles mentioning. Thereby, necessarily, we could conclude that these precise inspection around ARTICLE's kind with DEFINITE and INDEFINITE, could be applied to vety larger extent's general adjective's usage at inspection and analysis.

In other words, if we so formally and complete analysis to the presence of adjective otherwise its essential nature probing.

Next time to address to adjective, we must do the adjective's practical usage at transformation at vocabulary's deepening for expression with joint device or kind of combinating joinning or so at expressing mode.
That inspective appraoch necessarily demand today's addressing meaning's touchy transformative reality. In other words, necessarily words' meaning and usage could be at larger extent of our survival eras and human being's survival term by itself.

In other words, meaning by itself must be arbitrarily settled and fixed according to reactive reality in which we must surviven our all necessities. Meaning is just rekative at these realities!

(to be continued)

May.21st., Oct. 13rd.    2021