The one who is smart at listening to other one's talking around grievance otherwise essential mind affliction, anguish which could never gotten rid of our memory, or these things' consulting or any asking is not always the better than another one who is not smart at doing so.

Never yet, the one who is so kind at being heard of other one's asking or consulting on duty of job mission only officially, formally doing could be so apathtically cold-hearted, that case is never so rare.That so sarcastically bitter thing is never so exceptional.
Though, we should never be only officially, nor formally kind nor gently affectionate at what we could never be responsible, to that not personally confident matter, we should be rather cold and showing only our true disability, rather that acting must be more responsible and earnestly honest.

Though, necessarily, according to asking content's seriousness, if we had that so personally critical matter in life, I'd rather consult only not so officially and formally smart one, more awkward, but so merciful one.
In other words, on the personal criterion, so socially not sophisticated one could be at least to me, so believable and trustworthy.

Mind matter is completely different dimensioned thing from business and management one.

That option relies on my belief that usually not so skillfully acting one could be more confidential at so personally serious thing we have so generally secretly.

Ceremonial courtesy and mind attached thing are essentially mutually diffrentiated together. Between these thens are dimensionally very remote.

Knowing other one's heartache is never skill.

This truth has no paradox. Only orthodox is there.

Human social world must have very credible truth that generally very socially formally smart ones who could be heard of, listen to any other one so well, buv that is only obligatory kindness and only formally dutifully educated manner. From these, true affection is essentially different.

Earnest mind at listening to spiritually anguished mind is not only socially integral task issue. Never like that. Rather the one who usually is not so well accustomed with any other one at doing that thing could be suitable, we'd say so either.
Necessarily,the asking one's mind's honesty and sincerity must be questioned at any case.

Anyway, as far as concerned with very nervously our mind's issue, not only trained nor learnt so well, skill issue. Necessarily, any group, team, organization, even fellowship could have each distinct law or regulation, as socially necessary rule.

Nevertheless, we have an occasion that only socially necessary thing could never solve in life.

E. g. in life, we actually have so seriously grave mind's crisis at despairing thing no exit situation in terms of ethically and credo dimension.
Thereby, necessarily very paradoxically regarded thing even could never be so exceptionally 
realizable.
And necessarily, that our factual reality must have so frequently either contradictory nature thing.

Though the thing proves and makes us know that only smartly regulatory procedure could not be so enough at just not dealing with but also solving so completely, you know.
Hence, skill, experience, achievement or so are neither so trustworthy at these cases. Professional or not is never ultimate criterion.

What we should regard as the most trustworthy must be up to our so deepened at intrinsic faith and felicity level thing and not exactly any procedure level thing to our mind.
Eventually, only practically unsolved dimensioned thing must have taught us that to some extent, we should not rely on general opinion nor even social commonsense.

Therefore, if that mind could come up to our reality so personally, professional or not at assessing is neither so effective nor convincing to us.
Habitually smart nor intellectually persuasive.
Nor so familiar nor unfamiliar, so close nor so neither, not necessary. Necessarily no nobles oblige nor populalized.

Consequently, ultimately, we'd get the conclusion that each factor is not so vital, only more simply instinctively credible or not, otherwise, intuitively trustworthy or not could be questioned so almost so promptly occasionally.

Though, we even have at the last moment, even quitting all we'd schemed personally.
Then, that dimentioned things must be beyond legally regarded nor socially generalized nor so.

Everything around our own personal mindset and decision could not be logics nor theory.
Eventually, at very rooted dimension, even rational or so is invalidated.

In other words, socially general dutiful task issue and life matter are never comparison's dimentioned items.
Anyway, being with really seriously kept mind's crisis at despair, in fact, in world, you know, truly affectionate and mercifully kindness at well pitying sensitively, must exist, must be made by somebody.
That being to you intrinsically remote to socially carnal correctness. Easily these dimensioned things could be overpassed.

And at the very rarely coming up occasion, if we could have appropriate solution, that must be our not doubtfully unexpressionably miraculous wonder!

(to be continued)

Oct.  14th.      2021