As I suggested at Part1, entropy’s extention must associate that contrary reduction in regard of freedom. Because certainly either extending own freedom’s volume and freedom’s exntent in enlarging costs so much.
Though necessarily human mind makes it awoken to that plus advancing freedom paradoxically makes minus it at least notinally conscious regard.

Otherwise, our brain probalby implicitly has known that paradoxical truth, thereby necessarily plus advancing freedom’s enlargement could be regarded either as burden, though minus advancing rather positive regard could be awaked at their mind.

Though, not making transitive move as locomotion with some escaping or so from enemies in taking daringly not moving in staying home, otherwise, at some exceptional occasion, even daringly not escaping nor not excluding option with daringly being opposite, not actively moving only in thinking, deliberating or speculating or so.
That acting mode otherwise could be our unconsciously intuitional awareness to not easily making minus advancing against positively plus doing.

If normally standing still could be necessarily improved, that desirable aspect could be expanding intended aspect.
Normal state could be N, that improvable necessity must mean

I ≥ N

toward it, paradoxically

(I ≤ N )⊂(I ≥ N)

could be comppsed at least at consciousness.

That mind’s idea’s advancing aspect could be substitute to factually impossible minus extent’s freedom as realizable modus ponens toward possible plus extent(in just moving extent’s enlargement could be used embedding impossibility at taking our size expanded).

If freedom’s physical emobodiment could be I ≥ N, contrary paradoxical positiveness at realizing minus advancement could be I ≤ N, nevertheless it is physically impossible,
though our consciousness could make it similar it as substitute option at not moving in obtaining freedom.

(I ≥ N) ⊨ (N≒(I ≤ N ))

Upper consciousness is unconsciously done.

With these procedure, our freedom’s definition conseuently is inductively deduced at both
(I ≥ N) and (I ≤ N ) could be possibly applied.

Though,

(I ≥ N) ⊨ (N≒(I ≤ N ))

could be composed.

Because physically (I ≤ N ) is impossible.

(to be continued)

Nov. 28th. 2021