The earth has two polars, necessarily a day has two clearly symmetrical domains with daytime and nighttime.

Nevertheless, the brightest and the darkest moment are both not so long, almost time is filled with so never definitively one specific polar state zone. The indication must be adopted to the earth's domain except two polars.

Thus, essentially, truly signified "plain" must not be two polars nor times with both brightest nor darkest belts, but not clearly indicated kind of murky or inbetween belt, and that not so easily specified belt is the major presence, and anybody could be conscious about it, nevertheless that truly signified "plainness" could not be defined so smartly, to its truth, probably anybody is enough aware of, that very exceptional condition only the most major thing could have is enough known to anybody, hence in world to us, pseudo "plainness" could be necessary expediently in usual social site, therefore, two polar usage dragging "plainness" must be applied at usual conversation.

That very easy neglecting procedure must be mother of falsehood of definitive "plainness"'s usage for us.
That thing could be paraphrased with what truly plain domain is the most major and that presence has inconvenience at defining so clearly, that procedure cicumstanced difficulty in common understanding must make us two polar definition, as e.g. hot and cold, many and few, large and small. We could say so, necessarily.

Consequently, truly siginified genuine "plain" thing must be the largest domain sharing thing with neutrally inbetween nature, and just being but not specified featured thing, in other words, only the thing could be worthwhile at being defined as being, nevertheless, we at the case of explainable communication, only easily indicated expression or definition could be easily adopted.

Though, eventually our world's implicit procedure's premise is just abbreviating necessity.
Hence, truly anybody must know that the standard major domain as not so easily definitive must have the plainist being's nature. Just the thing is too natural or necessary to indicate so daringly, that procedure's our intuitively driven inertia's necessity must make us another typed of two polars' plainness.

These serially interpreted procedure tacitly done by anybody is just mother of any commonplace dualism.
In other words, in world, only commonplace things are the king or queen for any other all beings, nevertheless, that is too commonplace to mention daringly again, thus we usually use only carnally regarded as plain "two polars" as e.g. with "hot and cold" or "large and small" as the typical polar in dualism.

That mind's ordinary expediently done mechanism could be called or definied here as "intuitive 

However, essentially to us, truly plain domain must be only indifinitve just being commonplace domain's the most quantified things.
That truly lazy major domain is the true king or queen is too necessary to mention daringly again.

That our tacitly shared mind mechanism is our language usage dragging dualism's identity.
That very expediently done tacit our communicative definitve consensus or kind of convenient agreement can be just defined with a naming or so as "Intuitive Withdrawal from Truly Plain Domain".

Eventually, those our socially recognizable procedures are too necessary and easy to re-define or interpret daringly again, thus ordinarily we could omit that necessity.
Nevertheless, there one more very vital questioning must be submitted.
That is then, by the way, that the largest domain as commnplaceness could be relevant with nothing, and how that relevance could be interpreted or kind of analyzed for us to comprehend these things.
That very simple question must be left to us, consequently.

Otherwise, only the pair "the things too commonplace to re-define daringly" and "nothing" could be the true definitve dualism's pair, or so, really?
That very simple, but synchronically very profound problem presentation could be submitted.
Next chance to debate the "Intuitive Withdrawal from Truly Plain Domain", this indication could be dealt as main subject for us.
(to be continued)

Dec.   11th.         2021