In biological domain, very smaller sized insects' inhabitting domain is in the term of habitation's condition, very specifically focused exceptional conditioned zone.

In other words, they could sustain their survival only at the nature zone, but simultaneously, they could never be won by any other species at their own inhabiting zone.
That is their truly advantageous surviving power.

And probalby at biological world, they are natural selectively adapted, though necessarily their form of survival is like Galapagos.
This example must provide us some very meaningful question and proposition.

That is how we define truly definitive freedom.

At one domain which is so restricted in specifically opted could be one species' the sole zone for survival, they could be advantageous only at their survival zone, and their freedom must rely on that specified condition only they could have really in ecosystem, in other words, only in their adopted zone, they are the strongest and get true freedom.

That freedom necessarily the trophy after so harsh natural selection's breakthrough.

Though, necessarily, we'd get next definitive mechanism around freedom and that acquirement.

✴True freedom could be gotten only losing any other possibly free domain, in that tradeoff the freedom is acqurable.

✴That freedom's trophy could not have merit which only the transitively freest species.
Because even they could be won at not transitively free one specified condition adopted species.

✴However, those upper several truths must imply with that freedom's definition is too difficult to fix singular truth. In other words, very plurally many freedom's definitions exist, and these mutually discerned freedoms could make entangled reality and occasionally crossed together, and occasionally remotely sharing each domain together accidentally.

✴Thereby, these things could not be given statistically defined so easily, because ecosystematic mechanism is each very differentiated and exceptional according to each species. Though in the term of natural selection, one definitive adantageous strategy must never be defined. Though necessarily, freedom's definition is either so indifinitively indicative at this regard or analyzing context.

✴With upper truths, we'd submit next definitive mechanism in diagram.

        FREEDOM'S DEFINITION IS OUTPUTTED AT EACH OCCASIONAL CASE

BUT, AT THE SAME TIME, THAT DIVERSITY IS OUTPUTTED AT FIRST ONE SPECIFIED OPTED DEFINITION'S PRESENCE.

       UPPER TWO TRUTH'S MECHANISM PROVE THAT FROM ONE FREEDOM'S     DEFINITION AS SINGLAR TO PLURAL, and ANOTHER FROM PLURAL TO SINGLAR              these two different circuit given thinking modus ponens could be easily confirmed.

         　　　    〇　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　   〇〇〇〇....
　　　　　／　　＼　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　    ＼    ／
   　　　    〇〇〇〇....                                                                                   〇

(to be continued)

Dec. 12th.       2021