Originally, we are the presence which we know that we all are alive as not nothing in awareness of any idea around nothing or 0 which could outputted afterward we had conscousness around being present in relative reagard toward that aive fact, first death thing could be knwon, from the beginning not born thing could never have notion of "alive".

As necessarily as alive's notion, nothing could be known to us, only afterward we could have known the meaning of living, and being alive, with relative understanding, we could have known to meaning of death, and through it nothing, otherwise, when we look for something originally ought to be present and we don't find, we could be known to absence, and through the experience, at another process, we could have understood nothing's meaning.

Understanding meaning of nothing could be done through our immanent picturing of our now really embodied alive fact's assumption at presumable own dying and disappearing fact in world. Othewise impressive mind's legacy's disappearance with any facility, person, or so could make us known nothing's meaning in really confrimable truth and fact.

Therefore, the presence of prime number and its arrangement's enigma necessarily have created Riemann hypothesis in mathematics' history.

This is just so subjective my view, otherwise, we human was found prime number's arrangement's iregularity as seen that fact could have associated any mathmatician some alive fact's so miraculously accidental nature and it'd have us birth's very fragilly accidentalness and on the contrary, nothing as 0's so absolutely stable nature could be known so plainly.

Actually, mathematics' order could be seen so perfect, but either it must be human's finding and its systematizeing resluted aspect attending thing, tough necessarily that could have some serious gap beween it and God's providence. The idea must have been shared with any mathematician.

By the way, very necesarily being completed or absolute "perfection" must be what only being personally known to only imperfect and not complete as presence of us could make us.
In other words, that conceptual understanding for us contrarily proves that we all are never perfect, each just imperfect.
Because if there could be absolutely perfect presence, that must have never the concept or notion around "Perfection".

Though, essentially, to be frank, the notion and concept "Perfect, Perfection" is made by knwoing own imperfect nature of us.

PERFECTION is made by IMPERFECTION'S OWN ITS AWARENESS.

Though, according to its definitive condtion, necessarily, mathematics including Riemann hypothesis must be even imperfect.
And that our consciousness is derived from what truly we are unknown true perfection's appearance and we'd never have reached to the conclusion that it is the true perfection.

Thereby, PERFECTION COULD HAVE BEEN JUST SUPPOSITION, even that idea could never wiped out from our mind. In other words that our mind must have found Riemann hypothesis too.

Then, we could conclude like next.

Mathematic's enigma, Physics' enigma or so must be created by our own WISHING MIND TO GET PERFECTION DONE AT UNDERSTANDING.
In other words, that awareness must have make us find either Riemann hypothesis.

Hence, we could conclude like next.

ENIGMA IS FOUND BY OUR MIND KNOWN TO PERFECTION'S IMPERFECT SOLUTION. TO ITS IDENTITY AND QUESTION TO IT MAKES US GRAPPLING WITH ITS OUTPUTTED ENIGMA'S SOLUTION.

In other words, ENIGAM'S MOTHER IS OUR MIND'S DEMANDING TO KNOW PERFECTION'S IDENTITY, because nobody is not seen and understood it.

Otherwise, or probalby until we die, we'd never do all so smartly.
If we suppose perfection is P, and if we do enigma, e, next formulation could be possible.

OUR IDEA to ENIGMA (P),

then, necessarily our any mathematical order and logical it must be imperfect.
Then we can know

Human's known mind is to know any our ascribing truth is　¬(P).
We could for the present deduce only it.

(to be continued)

Dec.19th.      2021