First, I’d like to tell so general matter, with some my private thing in having idea and ever what I’d experienced.

In society, we are personally positioned at some signified role, necessarily around this reality, we know everybody is given social status, kind of position as seemed class, own profession.
With these our regarded or seemed social protocol could half compel us to do and be done at own content allotted. To be frank we all are obligated to do the must society around us could implicitly force us being in its mission.

At the matter of fact, nature world must have own intrinsically functioned balance and relevance in which any species could cope with any other biological presence with reciprocal fellows, enemies, and games, harvests for own species. Though essentially, nature’s ecosystem and its activity could not divide so easily, in other words, very complicated system as biological term as “complex system” could manage our all species. Biological term “Dynamic equilibrium” is one of the most important recognition around comprehending and understanding biological technology and own idea around knowing nature world’s essence. (At the matter of fact, nevertheless, I have an idea that nature world’s the most fundamental element “time” could have own lower limit, if that limit was completely absent from this world, e.g. biological life sustainable system could not be seen rationally interpreted, at least to me, that mind could be attended in my brain.)

Nevertheless, as Takeshi Yoro( Japan’s representative anatomist, essayst ) claimed, we use words of which character is completely divided at each role and usage at any object.
In other words, we are alive and survive this society, and for preserving this reality’s order, we could be socially configurated at own position and role, we use any word just for dividing our daily consciousness necessarily we are bound and assimilated our social reality.
As Yoro said, words are all devided unit, just unit by itself is destined at being used at each distinguished usage, discriminated role.

In other words, at any social site, term, vocabulary or so, we are organized with divided unit systematized reality. And number is the same. From the beginning, presence of number is characterized with our divided social modus ponens and our own social usage to words in some necessarily regarded social functional object and convenience.

There, why don’t we advance number’s own our usage’s signified identity?

At Part6, we reached to some important result or kind of one of so integral conclusion.
It was that we have three types of number in terms of its own nature, as 0, 1, and any other number.
That categorization must mean next mentioned truths.

✴０is not only our practical usage e.g. at revenue and expenditure, income and outgo at making ends meet, or arrangement around closing account, but also taking account of our instinctive surviving necessity, when we are at critical crisis around keeping our survival, we have very seriously acute consciousness at reducing our own survival chance and occasion for taking advantage of our own daily profittable acuirement around necessary outcome.
In other words, we are consistently facing acutely personal survival crucial emergency, at this regarded situation, what 0 means to us is never only notional nor conceptual, never yet very realistically definite surviving necessity.

✴1 means completely confirmable presence at mentioned object, or subject we’d have at convention or conference. That means philosophically subjective concreted notion and concept but necessarily never only fragile them rather the most fundamental evidence of our survival’s facts. Consequently any other number execpt 1 means any kind of application of what 1 has own signification.

✴Nevertheless, we can have equalized cognition around any number with each very distinct nature attending 0, 1, and any number bigger than 1, as 2,3,4,… that means coordinating necessity, as coordination toward any distinctively present thing in equalizing devise.
Thereby, we could have objectivity around doing anything for sustaining our society.
E.g. any greatly regarded social status as with President, Prime minister or so must have own length attending term of office, and over it, any great person must leave its obligation to next one.
In other words, our society at least generally standard it must have that order.
Namely, in spite of each class, each asset, each one thing’s knowledge, ability, competence, any citizen should be attended equivalent right at participating in any social activity.
In other words, these social consciousnesses are probably relevant with our usage of coordinate axis, thereby to accounting, 0, 1, and any other number, despite of each very distinctively regarded number’s nature, we must use all so evenly plainly at equalized cognition. At accounting we must never discriminate any number so exceptionally.

I’m not logician, then these all are just my own idea.
But at least in terms of universality around logical usage’s interpretation, next items must be composed.

❶We can have own instinctive cognition each distinctively at 0, 1, and any other number.
And mentally and spiritually 0’s degree is the maximal, because it must be relevant with minimal survical necessity, and next 1 is necessarily indespensable at preserving minimal safety. And gradually we’d get peace of mind according to increasing numerically affording quantity.

➋Nevertheless, at understanding, recognition, we usually are accustomed with equalization at any number, that wisdom could have made us objectivity with the comprehensive mechanism with coordinate axis or so as usage of e.g. slide rule, any kind of parameter at the term of caluculation, accounting as comprehension around sustaining objectivity as social obligatory necessity.

WE USE DISCRIMINATION AND EQUALIZATION in SIMULTANEOUSLY at NECESSITY to SUSTAIN OBJECTIVITY

THUS, DISCRIMINATION means SOCIALLY NECESSARY SURVIVAL on the other hand EQUALIZATION means OUR INTROSPECTIVE REVISABLE NECESSITY.(e.g. even former President, Prime minister could be one general citizen after term of office finishing all obligation given to them)
TOWARD FORMER OVERHEATING, we necessarily set LATTER COULD BE BROUGHT.
By the way, set theory is evidencing these all upper our mentally socially necessary subconscious minds as our necessity regarding mind at any site in practical usage.

IN OTHER WORDS, WE nevertheless the degree’s difference DARINGLY HAVE PARALLELED COGNITION, in ETHICAL COGNITIVE NECESSITY.

Necessarily degree’s difference means contribution to society or talented realizable outcome or so could be included.

0, 1, any number bigger than them, and its degree’s difference’s elimination, we set coordinate axis. Set theory is for understanding them all set for us.

DISCRIMINATION⇒EQUALIZATION

OBJECTIVITY⇔EQUALIZATION’S EMBODYMENT

0=¬1 ∧ ¬⊥0,1,2…

(to be continued)

Dec. 21st.     2021