If we try to seek after our truly signified survival strategy, so stark, how could we regard only being consistant at keeping the idea as only one same idea's keeping is so correct?

If only that idea is seen so honestly justified, how could we survive this very frequently convertible reality as by itself so frequently making chameleon?

To be frank, evil-minded anything could be made by carelessly honest at taking no notice to own security, because we all are from the beginning sinners.
Omicron strain's generation could be some omen to inifitely interating their evolusionary cunning strategy as some violently created natural selective option.

If we want us have steady victory to their infinite switchable strategy, one is keeping our not swtiched usually kept ordinary sheming still the same and to it, anytime the best method is replaceably exchanged mode keeping, otherwise, so better.

What makes us have a regard only no changing idea as the best?
That questioning is very necessarily useful now for all of us.

That could be just our dully conservative neglection at not trying anything.

Not having any consistent identified own-self is not so bad, isn't it?
Otherwise, not keeping any reaction to anything could be truly so advantageous strategy to us, couldn't it?

What makes us conservatively negative idea?
Just we want no losing already gotten thing.
But actually getting new worthwhile thing means just plainly losing and giving all up in our persistent mind, doesn't it?

Not having any stable idea and just according to all appearances around us, personally and anytime getting only the best timing could be similart to Shohei Otani's double swards strategy, couldn't it?

We need only elasiticity, only flexibly moving stance, don't we?

Otherwise we could be survived or sacrificed by frequently convertible COVID natural selective strategy, couldn't we?

(to be continued)

Dec. 25th.     2021