There is always the potential that nervousness for one person is laid-back for another, and conversely laid-back for another person is nervous for another. Therefore, we should not rule out the possibility that a double meaning can always be established or derived from any adjective meaning. That is the legitimacy of the judgment. Judgment is not uniform.

I've been reading Luther, Bergson, Levinas, and Ricoeur in parallel for three years in a row, but I'm actually discovering elements that I can't understand without adding Husserl and Hume. It is Hume in terms of memory and habits, and Husserl and Melponti in terms of carnalbody and physical body.

In theology Luther is Bergson, Hume, Descartes, Heidegger, while Calvin is Aristotle, Hegel, and partly Foucault in theology. It can be said that David Lewis or Moore are clearly Calvin-like, not Luther-like. It is a search for the correlation between theology and philosophy.

If the contemporary Michael Dummett character in Calvin's theology can be proof-theoretically suggested, conversely, it is no mistake to regard the ancestor of modern analytic philosophy as Jean Calvin. However, more mathematical demonstrability must be introduced in the work. Naturally, it is necessary to introduce the Godel incomplete theorem and the Brouwer fixed point theorem.

(to be conitued)

Jan. 1st.       2021