The most integral but unsolved issue for all human is based on what theists with several sects in mutual hostility according to each case as the touchily different and atheists with animistic ideas must be at mutual distrust.

World necessarily has politically, finanncially so harshly tough problems, but if theists and atheists in mutual misunderstanding could be diffused away from our the earth mess-up, we'd be eased at half perfection at wishing no more that the past for all us.

First, we should address to logically necessary condition at convincing us have assurance around our presence.

If we, for the present, try to convince us that universe's birth was the sole occasion as miracle at giving us all with any other creature and mineral or anything present in this universe, now suppose that 0 was the ogirinal beginning og this universe's being and all afterward was 1 as presence in assurance, necessarily 0 was the origin of all, and necessarily theism must have kept their idea that God created this universe, and that idea is still the manority for almost 60％ ones in this earth. 

Surely the first step of birth was seemed to be Big Ban, and that was perfectly necessary, beforhand any universe could have never been appearing in so inifinite span, that universe's birth seed could have potentially indwelled from the nothing of beginning, in other words, any atheism must have no ogirinal limitation, in other words, any theism must have the idea that first birth and its absolute miracle, but beforehand anything must have never been anything, must have been nothing, that idea must be sustainable.

However, if theism's first step with a Great Help by God was perfectly convincing and absolutely correct, probably that absolute miracle embodied with God's miraculous providence could never be devestated by the idea that its outpost of God's help to create universe must have had everlasting without no origin(in other words, everlasting past must be composed) as infinite outpost as preparation set only for God's help at creating universe could never be infringed, nor insulted by anything.

In other words, we could get a hypothesis that 0 was surely beforehand universe must have been given birth to be present, beforehand 0 could have appeared, necessarily -1,-2,-3.... infinite minus regarded preparation term must have been indwelled, hence necessarily that idea was so appropriately convincing to all human, if expediently there, God's birth by Himself must have been present at 0's point for all of us, beforehand universe's birth outpost as being's preparation must have been another miraculous presence as - presence and that feature of universe's birth viewing is dependent on mainly atheism, polytheism.

Then, consequently, theism must have been noticed at the first Great help by God's universe's creation, on the other hand, atheism as polytheism must have been noticed at that Great Creation's basic underground as what to reach to 0, that idea could be credible to all human's idea in consensus.

In other words, atheism as polytheism is just notice to nothing relevant with being's basis  itself, on the other hand theism is just notice to being's birth by itself with the Great help by God, as miraculous fact by itself.

If these all hypothesis could be somewhat convincing logic, we'd never have need to worry about mutual hostility around theism and atheism.
However, necessarily in theism, specifically Christianity and Islamism could have no solution around mutual hostility still now, but that issue is another dimensional it, and toward it, we all human being should go ahead for solving completely, but about that issue, I want me have more enough consideration kept term for releasing my theory here, you know.

(to be continued)

Jan. 16th.      2022

Appendix; Next occasion must be about not present outpost's modud ponens and impossibilty around perfection to be nothing as logical necessity.