Machines are usually never moving without our indication with layer cognition.
In other words, e.g. computer os so must depend on order, and indication, but human mind has spontainity. Though, we all are capable to think by myself, but machines are never so, though machines must follow only procedure attending layer in regulatory turn.

In other words, machines generally are never relevant with any leap( thereby, Kubric described his 2001 Space Oddyssey.

Nevertheless, we love leap, neglection toward ordered things, regulation or so.
In other words, only obediently following another one's instruction tries to train any younger generation one in the one's credo, and the one has no flexibility around the one's managing one's each spontaneity.

Generally animals as mammal has only knows difference, and no discerning between difference and similarity, necessarily intuitively mamal except human could discriminate any familiar things' similarity, but probably their discrimination must be limited at that the most familiar things.
Nevertheless, we human generally are different, to not so familliar things, we'd discriminate each other in plural things.

Otherwise, kind of optional arbitariness or flexibility to be satidfied with replaced thing toward originally hoped thing could be caused from that fact as our favor to the matter which has similarity and not inflexible in dissatisfaction around what we get.

In human society, sometimes we can observe the one who is regidly only keeping regulation and not having any canicalizing wisdom nor no satisfaction around what ghe one first hoped in losing chance in deniable reaction to any replaced option, the kind of ones must be similar to machines or so.

However, we could otherwise even love the same pattern, e.g. toward our own favorite song tune, in concert, the singer who always sings it could arrange that song's tone, and very arbitrarily makes conversion in improvisation, unless that devise is so miraculously wonderful, we usually have disillusion, to that unnecessary accessory.

In other words, we love either rule and fixed form, specifically around own so favorite thing.

That shows that very superior ogirinal rejects any minor duplicate, and that our nature could have made in our history, kind of authority relevant with dinasty, any kind of norble birth and linear standard or formality.

Namely, we obviously have unidentifed two sided character, or favoriticism.
Additionally that option around which is so generous at accepting replaced another option or not, we have no strict rule nor standard or reason to convince anybody, in other words, our mind is very loosened at ctiricizing, judging momentary occasion to anything, in other words, that not completed ideological inconstancy could make us discerned with any machine or so.

Yes, very capriciously lazy nature is kind of good assessable our flexible somewhat, originally.

This very irregularly made whim's identiy is unexpectedly too difficult to analyze that mind mechanism, that thing otherwise means our life's infinite accidentality's presence in daily empirical life's aspect, and that inifintely empirical thing is perfectly according to each person in each different context at being raised, attending stepped roads or so as physiologically reasoned condition's difference.
In other words, that thing's intrinsically unidentified factor must be the motivation for any author, writer, singers and screenplay writer, dramatist, or so.

Jan. 22nd.    2022

This series will be done so perfectly at not previously schemed considered outcome, only randomly I want this run.