What I provide as my questionanble proposition must have next typical truth nowadays.

EACH ORGANIZATION’s INTENTION is MUTUALLY GAPPED, but that fact could CONTROL TOTALITARIANISM to any country.

Upper reason must be the most credible or convinced reason for interpreting is that each organization’s authorizes standpoint are mutually distanced, any national citizen can have easy mind, though essentially government and congress, bureaucracy, academism are mitually gapped, that reality is not so surprising reality.

Thereby, specifically to any country’s military soldiers, I want to wish keep their lives safe, secured by themselves, that thing could be applied not only to US, Ukraine them but also Myanmar’s soldiers, protesters’ citizens. And either each criticizing activists, critics, and brave bureaucrats.

IN OTHER WORDS, at any circumstance, any sacrificed one should never be outputted, only for securing worldwide totalized balance.

In other words, e.g. at the moment of evacuation and withdrawal from Afghanistan, so many US soldiers lives and them of former Afghanistan’s governmental officials, minor ethnicity identified units of people or so with many popular citizens’ lives were lost, that similar examples could be easily noticed and found at Kazakhstan, and other countless countries.

Only for keeping each organization’s security, any personal life should never be sacrificed so really.

WHY I CLAIM so is ACTUATED by the TYPICAL FACT that at any eras, UNEXPECTEDLY ONLY for SECURING MASS-COMMUNICATION ORGANIZATION, very PRECIOUS PERSONAL LIFE MUST NEVER BE SACRIFICED.

BECAUSE, the MOST IMPORTANT thing is JUST EACH PERSONAL LIFE, NEVER each ORGANIZATION’S AUTHORITY. Nevertleless, at any country, any organization, UNEXPECTEDLY, each PERSONAL LIFE could be easily NEGLECTED, and ONLY ORGANIZED AUTHORITY is prone to be PRECEDED, at this reality any country, any organization is never exceptional from very old days to nowadays.

(to be continued)

Feb. 5th. 2022

Appendix; At the matter of fact, certianly sentences' description is threatening nature, too, I admit, but music performance, drama playing or so with movie and TV broadcast and any kind of audience's enthusiasm to cheer, with any festival, that typically either dangerous nature could be applied either to literature theme(either literature's dangerous nature is included).

Nevertheless, I cannot suppress my amusement at enjoying any sport competition with life critical fighting with martial arts, and any kind of harsh violent description on movie, novel or so, either, I honestly admit as well as any pornography's own excitement. Nevertheless, very contradictory mutually.