Memory thing is not shared to anybody, onlyit is hman's essence around each one's own identity in taking anything necessarily with it.

Because to even the same thing, one generated matter in past signifies each distictly, that meaning or kind of interpretation must have mutual mental, physical gap around assesing, estimating the outcome or any consequent impact or so.

Though, society thing could go on that premise. In other words, society by itself as our all tacit consensus for the present could take each momentary arbitrary trend.

Though, on the contrary, we all human could accumulate another mind, that is how we can have kind of etenity, because everything going on society seems to be so fragile.

And there we can have some very clear question.
Parmanence is truly possible to exist, or not, and what makes that condition.

There, if our own life was parmanent, how does our life and our society could do itself as the fact that each one has no death, how can we have own life stance?

In world without death, can we have hope?
Otherwise, is that society so perfect, or to it, do we have hope or can we hope the world's future?

However, from the beginning, our all social activities or so must be going on that we all are mortal, never immortal.

In other words, what we can have philosophical supposition around our immortality means that we all are nothing but moral, in other words, only mortality must manage our society's each life and the modus ponens.

Memory thing is each different and mutually gapped, though we can have mutually different personality, nevertheless, certainly that thing drag that our society has discord, mutual hostile emotion, intention and we are prone to have unnecessary conflict too.

Of course, mutually we all human-being must have language difference, cultural it or, any mutual difference.
However, that mutual gapped reality otherwise could be regarded as kind of future possibility or potentially penetrating nature to us, that opinion or remark could be told from anybody.

Though, essentially these questionable issues are unexpectedly too nasty to solve so easily.
(to be continued)

Feb. 8th.    2022

Appendix; Next time to grapple with this issue, how we could parmanence in mind or really substantially, the question must be dealt with in this title's debate.