Fundamentally, to us, ordinarily, to larger extent, in terms of body sizable cognition, generally we can tangibly feel freedom at larger extent, and necessarily contrary, very micro sizable reality could not impact our mind in freedom given extent.

Of course, Kant philosohical ethical signified freedom❇ must have nature inclination to reasonable self binding and very conscious effort making will.
Nevertheless, that true ethical freedom and spatially opened extent providing freedom must be mutually differentiated dimensinonal comprehension to each other.

In other words, to us, ordinarily bodily physically given freedom must rely on only enlarged extent t bodily physically given freedom must rely on only enlarged extent than body which is equal to never making transition in staying fixed location or whereabout.

Though, essentially, to any externally generating phenomenon, we usually physically and perceptively only to extending aspect notice and make our consciousness easily witness and observe objectively.

Thus, according to these premised conditions and modified signified identity, we could judge that more daily usage regarded easier measurable method could be applied only to spatially extendable modus ponens.
Our ordinary conceivable mind attention's the easiest comprehension in terms of FAMILIARITY, at least to our mind, only larger extent enlarged condition could be easily approachable and picturing is easy to do in mind, and at least in terms psychological extent, we can have easy associable interepretation only to ifinitely enlarged spatially direction only gives us FAMILIARITY, and we can imagine that condition so easier than contrary micro extent's inifinitely dividable Zeno's paradoxical proposition is seemed so exceptionally notional, and conceptually complicated.

 Thus, essentially at daily sensing of normal cognitive sensibility, necessarily minor extent's inifinity's cognition is very unfamiliarly intentional, and daringly conscioiusness mobilizable that nature is very innatural and so specified comprehension.

These interpretable truth could simply evidence that the same coceptually confirmable inifnity has both mutually very symmetrical relevant things must exist to our sensation.

FAMILIARITY exetent cognition must be applied only to inifitely larger extent and against it, mentally and psychlogically obviously infinitely smaller extent means more abstract, and unnatural and very arbitrary, though, a least psychlogically we have mutual very remoted sensed inifinity's intepretations.

And it shows that one as larger extent it is very concretely picturable and easier understandable at physically concrete dimension, meanwhile to smaller extent infinity means at least to us is very formally regarded abstract.

Though originally one the same term as "inifinity" has otherwise includes both mutually almost sensibly even hostile relevant concept and our mind can hold these simultaneously in no feeling contradiction.

That truth to some extent can evidence us that we use very expediently one fixed index, this case "Infinity" as relativity index is adapted for usage, nevertheless, our mind's sensing antenna as tangibly sensable index and conceptually and notionally semiologic comprehension is to us acceptable nevertheless mutually to us, our mind could have gapped sensibilty, these mutually very contradictory index setting at the same time, that thing could be very enigmatically undentified.

And this truth shows that notinally kind of left brain's comprehension and right brain's spatially realizable condition's grasping comprehension are mutually very symmetrically different, nevertheless, our probably left brain in charge of notionally formalized sensing could take and deal with keeping that idea in brain(by the way, our brain's idea is kind of closed room's internally generating thing as being privately recollective and imaginable and also very secretly kept publicly hidden these two mutually different mode given fact.

Let's summarize.

WE HAVE MUTUALLY CONTRADICTORY COMPEHENSION, SIMLTANEOUSLY.

THAT TRUTH SHOWS that OUR BRAIN and MIND CAN HAVE mutually CONTRADICTORY more than TWO IDEAS SIMULTANEOUSLY.

That our brain and mind functional working is so far very unidentifed at least to my mind.
And to that truth. I have trustworthy meaning around inspecting and persuing worthwhile propositional significance and identification.
(to be continued)

Feb. 11th.    2022

Appendix; To us, notion and mind's keeping familiarity is mutually very differentiated dimensional spiritual activity by brain and mind. This means to us discriminating, discerning each independently in mind. Kind of categorizable mind.