What generally philosophers could interpret or analyze for the identity around being "myself" or individually private idea holding person as nothing but the ones who have no idea about each own mind is how to exist, how to incline.

Nevertheless. philosophers are apt to analyzed the issue maximally objective, though consequently they are prone to regard each one's mind only according to data referring credibilty or so.
Though necessarily, their idea around intepreting each one's mind could be intended to statistically generalized the most ordinary and commonplace aspect.
Though, truly to any own "myself" philosophers' inspecting and summarying idea is very formally formulated, or kind of very daringly normalized and flatted, though almost their opinion could not be useful to our own subjective mind for solving and breaking through any distressed and annoyed situation around own life, not so helpful. Because they only engage themselves in academic value's keeping and recording the reality they usually make.

On the other hand, normal novelist or documentary sentence writing and reporting ones' work must be dependent only on their subject.

In other words, objectivity is not so useful to make own reading one impacted with so realisitically referrable data for synthesizing own mind's projecting intention and object, that not academism belonging one's sentences.
Because that reading fundamentally is based on reading one's subjective option.

Nevertheless, to anybody, own idea around each one's reality is constantly each so personally and specifically private, though any generalizable scheme could not be so useful.
Not only the fact but also, we know only very personally exceptional truth around life spending situation, though ultimately, only subjective opinion by the one whose situation seems to be similar to reading one's it could be to some extent so appropriately helpful in terms of subjective assessing and judging.

However, to any personal mind, probably only own personal mind's true apperance is not so understandable. In other words, constantly, only to any other one but each own self, we'd keep objective view and only to "myself" is not so naturally successful around knowing so objective view or appreance, though necessarily we need personally kind of dutifully belonging life position as the same circle members' gathering and publicly socially interacted human relation and network could be necessarily needed to anyone, and either internet using social network service is not exceptional.

After all, probably to anybody, only own apprearance is not so clearly noticeable and not so easily known more than our personally viewing any other person except us.

Eventually only that own blindness around only "myself" is not regarded nor evaluated, assessed by any personal identified us.

In other words, only any other one except own "myself" must be easier known so objectively.
That typically very necessary truth could not be found by any greatly seen philospher, that factual reality is very sorry matter to us, so generally.

After all, to any concerned thing, only viewing own thing the most objectively could be the most important and necessary mindset.
At the matter of fact, eventually only that mindset could help us in so Harsh dangerous situation. Though, if we try to have mindset only to own "myself" so the most severely, we'd do everything at evading the worst situation caused from other one's condemnation.

Eventually, to any other one, we should keep our eyes on in our subjectively known circumstance and only to "myself" the most objectively seing and trying to interpret are the most important our method we generally believe in for knowing the best method around swimming in the community in which to some ypically carnal term,  almost strangers could surround us as the personal situation, only that mindset is not so dangerously regarded idea, at least I can think so objectively.
(to be continued)

Feb.  13th.     2022