At least for Martin Luther and his certain creed around God's providence and its running parmanence means not easy care around diffusing our carnally stocked nasty burden, but rather leaving all future prospect around our burdensome matter now we have in mind only God.

He said in his mainly important enlightening text like next.✹

"What we are provided with our human hands is actually not human's baptism, but truly Christ's it, otherwise God's it which we recieve."

"I believe that baptism is not done with the name of human, but with the name of the lord, and that'd be the truth, no matter what method could be applied, that must provide true rescue.
Far from it, no matter who gives it, if the one could give with the name of the Lord, even if it'd be given by the ones who disbelieves, the receivers could be given of the name of the Lord, true baptism. Because baptism's power is graver than the one who receives baptism, and it'd never consist in the baptism giving one's beleif. 

These just leaving God's providence around anything we are having own demanding in mind means kind of absence of any border in any religion in regard of integral credo's convergence. Universality of each religion's hostility and conflict could be invalidated at least at this leaving our mindset we must pay attention to impress our mind spontaneously according to God's own affection and own intention.

Why these leaving minds could be versatillly so effective, after all, intending mind could rely on our own desirable scheming in mind, it'd never acquire what our future road could get smooth running, on the contrary, in giving up any carnally schemed devise so eanestly only in reliance to everything's own letting go on own way, any unnecessary desirably schemed conceit could be solved in only believing every proceeding running natural state, in other words, that no oddly contributed deliberate is not effective at least on providentially schemed running in our natural surviving road.

That could be our human world's mutual relevance and its own mutually reliant on any other naturally made scheme to have a aequel of complition as each way to be only on what it should be, and only that consequntly done in running must never be schemed in our mind so consciously.
That's why we have to respect and regard as the most credible presence only to every necessary running and its guiding sequel in not our own desirble intention, only over it, that unidentified power could have been executed, that'd be necessity around what matches providence. It'd be equivalent with nature's universally distributing outputting.

In other words, only to our mind, just having nothing about unecessary intentional blue print, just relying on every running by itself on that naturally done road.

At the matter of fact, to us, that our mindset we should redress our conceit around own power's impacting extent, in other words, only at the moment we abandon all these empty trial around the last coordinating devise, only nature power as equivalent with providence could get us reached into the completed fruit in reality.

Hence, at some meeting, conference around our addressing to so tougher and so heavily suffering situation, only that own idea and arbitrarily taken discretionary judgement could be reset in no clear conclusion in picturing, first we'd get so naturally the best development we all could welcome. Probably it'd be gotten only at mutually leaving stance and that mind device must have natural accord at mutually having any other one's true trust to the one, and knowing it in believing in mutually producing own fruit together.

In other words, when we reach to the state for believing in mutual abilty and trust, first we'd get our own accord reached to the immovable point, because that matched accord must never have been done without mutually believable trust to any other one's potentiality and will to share common consciousness.

This is very ordinary positively regarded mutual mindset in making own accord, but seems to be so universally available and versatilly so powerful as far as concerned with very practically running site at any field or domain we are engaged in so personally.

(to be continued)

✹De Captivitale Babylonica Eccelediae Praeludium (1520), in WA, abt. 1, Bd. 6, S. 497-526.
Original text is based on upper indicated, really referred text is 宗教改革三大文書 付「九五箇条の提題」深井智朗訳、マルティン・ルター　講談社学術文庫2456