If we try to keep our reason for completing our own mission, the first as we should keep in mind is surviving objectivity’s snare.

Very necessarily at the field of physics, the first supposer to it was Heisenberg.
Einstein was either super-excellent genius one in that field, probably he also relied on objectivity. Necessarily only it could squash his great acheivement, but as long as we debate in terms of objectivity, he was either that typed genius.

What only objectivity could trap us is probably next truth. That is what we are prone to understand objective view must be comprehensively regarding the best method, though rather we could be trapped into that so strict net.

However, objectivity must have so seriously grave defect.
That is that comprehensive grasp could seduce that only it could be the best option to be adopted by us.
Why I want to claim so is derived from my next mentioned idea.

Namely, objective view could exclude any subjective view and its our necessity, but if we try to make everything objectively regarded or seen, any our subjective mind around viewing it could be outed and eliminated as the unnecessary idea.

Nevertheless, we can have another idea. That is viewing all things objectively means that we are, at least at setting range or extent we should try to grasp, arrogant at knowing so well must be made only by wholly totalized view, and through that view, we must get truly credible value so precisely. But the attitude is already so arrogant. Because even if we try to grasp all things so comprehensively, any our viewing inviting mistake or groundless credibility is completely neglected, that thing is certainly evidenced.

Nevertheless, if we try to take into account our own subjective view and that mind could never be excluded so completely in kind of honest detachment, we could evade at least former mentioned arrogance. Because this attitude is at least based on our recognition and awareness to know our own propensity around accompanying subjectivity.

Frankly speaking, in fact, objectivity in viewing must have decisive defect, it is believing in wholly totalized view is either very uncertain subjective view, in other words, if we try to get our minimal premise around having maximal attentive and careful view, that must be our earnest detachment around that we are never grasp wholly totalized view at a stretch, though knowing only that we all are unable to get anything so wholly totalized view.

OBJECTIVITY is ONE of the MOST ARROGANT Belief to OUR FACULTY.

Certianly just subjectively facing is either so danger, but if we try to think that subjectivity is either powerless, and nevertheless knowing that we can never exclude its view, at the moment, we’d get another view. That is, knowing objectivity must cause wholly totalized view acquirement, and it must have decisive defect to neglect our own subjective view, in other words, only subjective view could make us have introspective view around what we have stance in mind.

SUBJECTIVE MIND HAS OWN MERIT.
IT is KNOWING that SUBJECTIVE VIEW has OWN LIMIT. That is not objective view and objective view must have wholly totalized view acquring trial and either it has so decisive defect.
Because we are unable to get wholly totalized comprehension at a stretch.
Though, necessarily, only having not so strictly credible subjective mind, and knowing it as what we are never almighty, at least it could evade all our arrgance to regard our reason the best option around starting something.

At the matter of fact, great philosopher Immanuel Kant claimed that reason’s arrogance is one of the most attentive view to us, in his whole life.

Yes, objectivity’s almighty myth must be derived from our reason’s arrgance, and if we could evade it so carefully, objectivism as wholly totalized capture must be either so dangerous method.

To this article view, one former this blog’s article “Communicative Aspect we can Confirm / To Us, To God, and Other” could be useful for understanding my view.
In other words, taking account of my that article, leaving everything around what we try to grasp, into our knowable domain is constantly restricted, though from the beginning, only wholly totalized view could be object for taking it ✹epochē, we at least could get us safe not at taking jumping at the gun for grasping all at a stretch.

In other words, only leaving everything around what we want to get, in object and aim we’d set up as initial setting, only what we can engage us in the first stage is based on first premised trial, but in running it in our trial, next phase telling our next task, bit by bit we’d find out next phase necessary reactive method.

We only can have partially prospective viewing, though with inspection to first engaging trial and with its outputted data, we should react next phase for the first time.
In other words, because we all are running everything in uncertainty, though essentially, we should evade only objectivity reliant view from the beginning, then necessarily leaving everything around any proceeding and its minimal outputted outcome, and checking it carefully, next for the first time, we should resume that task’s reaction to next phase.

Only one thing, I’d like to mention is FOR the FIRST TIME, only OBJECTIVE VIEW means just NEGLECTION to LOOK at CAREFULLY around what could be going on at realtime, Because, we all first in having own subjectivity in mind, then thought that fact, for the first time we could get everything started, and in it, gradually truly meant object could be found.

OBJECTIVITY must be restricted in a range of certainty deriving domain, and to any other domain, objectively viewing is rather so dangerous, because, either objectivity must be another subjective arrogance.
TRUE SUBJECTIVE VIEW must depend on RESTRICTED OBJECTIVE VIEW and KNOWING even all OBJECTIVITY is either very arrogant SUBJECTIVITY.

EARNEST SUBJECTIVITY means WHAT WE LIMIT our own OBJECTIVITY and MODESTLY APPLYING either SUBJECTIVITY.

(to be continued)

Feb. 17th. 2022

Feb. 17th.      2022

✹