Anyway, we can imagine that from the beginning, if the universe could have had been mechanically schemed, excluding any materilal as element, necessarily really impossible to do, if we could eliminate any that element from this universe, only empty as the perfect blank could appear, of course, that development could never emerge.

Then, universe's birth was otherwise kind of container only for making any element present, universe's presence as substantial form could have been initially set container(nevertheless its extent could swtich by itself) and that container's belongings with any element.

Consequently, what perfect blank as container of any matarial means, only the question must be left to us, in this debate.
Nevertheless, universe has at each time, own capacity or volume.
Otherwise, any particle's birth could have been simultaneously at the time to be born of universal space(outer space) as the container for any element.

Though, if we focus on only purely not materialized aspect's space, it has the nature which is almost identical with nothing.
However, if universe's birth meant either any particle's original form's it, that case must attend the appearance of spatial extent and its containing any element which is drifting in strictly gathered united condition.

Upper the last mentioning is based on universe's space and any element's presence in organic relevance. Probably that phenomenal essence must make spatial swtichable aspect and time's running in simultaneity. And it means that spatial aspect swtiching makes time, and time's running makes spatial aspect swtiching.

Consequently only spatial aspect's appearance makes any elemental that, and latter makes former synchronically, only that assumption could be outputted.
If that assumption could be correct, genuinly spatial blank as subustantially absolute materialized aspect's nothing could be impossible, that presumptive conclusion could de deduced there.
And that view must be the idea that universe thing is absolutely the sole unit. One giantic, but either one element, or simple substance as if from one person's birth to the one's death could be done there.

Anyway, if there is absolutely blank pure nothing, that must never be divided, though space itself could be another form as field which certainly gurantees any elemental moving, and transition.

Hence, according to nature principle, otherwise, from the beginning, any materialized presence as particle and space itself could be at completely mutually attached one thing's face and back, only that hypothesis could be made there with former all debates.

In other words, any elemental union and division or any particle’s transition in totalized aspect makes one universe's space, so synchronically.
That might have meant that container's changing is equivalent with any elemental changing itself.

That changing aspect could be impacted by container's whole aspect, and either whole aspect could be impacted by each elemental changing, that'd be either simutaneity.
(to be continued)

Feb. 21st.   2022