Science must have nature mechanism's so cool observing spirit and realized stance in action necessary for them.
Meanwhile, philosophy mainly persists in mind issue.

However, one so disicive fact is probably based on that our mind is belonging to our body.
That indication certainly was picked up by Maulice Melreau-Ponty, but his approach was either so notionally regarded one ordinary philosphy's taking stance.

Actually our body must have undeletable interaction with space and really existing material.
Nevertheless, its pointing out stance is not based on empiricalism nor so.
Rahter our bodily physically tangible daily fact should be taken so objectively strictly never deniable fact.

In other words, we are never abstract presence.
We all are actitng, moving to anywhere and moving our own body, though any notionally perceptive our questionably proposition must be interacted with physically embodied condtion and its fatal actual reality inducing otherwise carrying own condition and mind nature or so.

Why philosophy could not take that my suggesting stance must be causedv from that they all are having elite consciousness only bureaucrats could get as privilege. 

Paper generally means very specified academic report, and that nature drags almost philosophers so formally strictly precise paper creation, but that extremely careful mind could affect occasionally any written things as paper document so conservatively not so versatile for any reader.( that typical presence was Immanuel Kant.)

Meanwhile, Logics are usually schemed through formulating description.
That equational devise is very concretely shown to really realized our world's appearance.
Equational order and words' conceptual notion reliant order are mutually diferent.

By the way, our mind could not be so stronger than we estimate it so convincingly, in other words, at both city environment, rural empty field, or any nature resources, we'd never sever any spatial interaction only at one moment.

That notice must convey our consciousness that only objectively measured index could not be so sufficient at knowing our own present identity, because mind and body reacting any physical condition means just specially and time running sustainable interaction, when we drive in own car, walking in pavement, path in moutain, using elevetor in building, stting down own chain in our own home, participating in conference in room with any other participant, any situation must be interacted with own physical condition and our own mind could attend anytime constant same idea, neverhtless, our mind also is impacted by any our staying condition.

E.g. when we personally want to concentrate our own consciousness around reading something, listening to some other person's talk, we absolutely need own condtion for matching that demanind our body and mind.
In other words, mind by itself does never independently exist, anytime accomanying body, space and time.
The same one hour could have each different conditioned one hour in time spending, in home, in opned space, in jail, in classroom, company employee's office, or any each diffrentiated condtioned diffrence must impact our mind so critically, not at so small extent to mind and body.

That part's indication or pointing out are so hardly seen in any philosophy, that could be left to psychology or physiolosy, but either philosophy should take it into account for advancing its accompanying own logic.
(Irregularly to be continued)

Apr. 7th.     2022