Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Very Simply Relative Interpretation a. Around Space and Time

✷One being thing(as some meant identified substance, material) could never stay at plural locations simultaneously. Space's fundamental nature makes us aware of that we either are one part of space.


✷Upper truth deduces either that simultaneously plural beings could never stay at one location(space).


✷Upper two items' mentioned things showing truth could be the spatial law, it'd be the evidence that space's nature is absolutely accidental.


✷Against upper all truths, time could never be applied to them all.
In some present time's running, plural things could stay at the time's location(if there could be attending that identity).


✷Upper truths could evidence that time’s nature is absolutely necessary, and its fact has no doubt nor not convincingly conceivable question so far, we'd say so.


✷Rather than all mentinoned things, spatial accidentality is given by time's consistency.


✷However, meanwhile, time's consistency is given by space's accidentality.


Because if time could never be relevant with space's presence, time could have never been tangible to us and never concerned with time to our life. Necessarily it'd be contradictory to our life substance. Though it is just ❇Categorical imperative


(to be continued to b.)


Apr. 13th.    2022