Russia has the largest uninhabited area of desolate land in the world. Next is Canada. Indigenous peoples from pre-modern times inhabit these areas in a dissipative manner. It is impossible to understand Russia with Western logic. We, the West, and Russia (as well as China) geographically have completely different conditions for forcing residents. There is mutual incomprehension.

For Russia, it would have been a great threat that Ukraine was moving away. In fact, after Ukraine, Finlan and Sweden approached NATO as if they had returned their palms. Now suppose that the current international movement has brought Russia into sanctions and conquered Russia in the western order. I’m sure the world order is over at that point.

From our point of view, Russia has created the threat of North Korea, followed by China. But I’m sure that even if all the nations that recently opposed the UN resolution, such as these three countries, Belarus, and Syria Azerbaijan, who supported them, could be incorporated into the nations that agreed, and the world could be unified (it would be impossible, but if that happened). At that point the world is over.

In the current UN resolution, the trend side is the American axis. But if (although its true metaphysical and physical mechanism is unknown) the whole world is turned to the west, then the world will internally create a trend to recreate the former Russia and North Korea. Even if North Korea is transformed into a democratic nation, a different nation will become dictatorship.
Let’s think like this. Analyzing the burden on the world if the whole world is democratic and completely west, it is certain that the world has a certain percentage of closed dictatorships (including Vatican City and San Marino). Even if the equilibrium that had been there is destroyed, it will surely be out of control. Perhaps that is the controlling truth.

A critical analysis of capitalism, liberalism and democracy is different from praising communism and socialism. Now Czechoslovakia will have much less wasted land than Russia. In many countries that have been taken to the west, there should be few unexplored Russian traces. However, if such land is extinguished, the world equilibrium will be destroyed.

Russia’s violence is certainly unforgivable. However, at the same time, it is dangerous if Russia has no choice but to take into consideration the circumstances. It is true that Ukraine’s current state itself was the greatest threat in Russia’s long history. Therefore, it cannot be said that Ukraine is the cause, but it is certain that Ukraine was seen as a devil, at least due to the circumstances of Russia.
For example, if someone suddenly hits someone on the train next to you who is caught in a hanging strap, that person becomes a criminal. That’s right (that’s Russia now). But there’s some reason he did that to someone next to him. If you don’t hear it at all and just impose sanctions on the one you hit, that would be a hotbed for another conflict in the future.(Recollect Natiz’s appearance was dervided from so much compensation at losing of world war 1st as expiration’s sanction.)

Conversely, suppose that all existing dictatorships (Russia, North Korea, China, Syria, etc.) have been arbitrarily improved into democratic and liberal economic nations such as the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France. Considering the problems of nature that will be destroyed in the liberal competition of the world economy at that time, I’m sure that a certain degree of non-liberal economic zone is necessary.
Rather all liberalism countrties which apply capitalism economy and financing system must be made by world diverse political and economical systems as irresistibly present forms, in other words, communism and socialism, and dictatorship adopting countries are made by liberal countiries, contrary truth is correct.

If there are five people in the world now, I’m sure three people will advocate a democratic liberal economic society in the west, but the two are different (including Russia, North Korea, China, Belarus, Syria, and Azerbaijan). .. In fact, it would be hell if China became like the United States for ethnic minorities in China. It’s true even if the West is justice.

If a Zelensky-like shareholder who has made a sudden leap forward at a general meeting where I participate as a shareholder dismisses other shareholders and everyone wants to unite with each other, I will withdraw from that general meeting. It is necessary to determine whether the person named Zelensky is completely good. NATO may be ruined by joining a dangerous person. Close to joining a former Yamaguchi member.
Emotionally, from the beginning I thought that Russia’s violence was a success. Because it is the Ukrainian engineer who has taken the lead in developing the northern missiles that will be launched into the Sea of Japan. They are nuclear professionals. Zelensky followed them, betraying his former teacher and making the world his side. Do you trust the traitor who suddenly rubbed you too?(By the way, any Ukraine citizen is just innocent, just only few numbers of people who probably try to take advantage of nuclear pioneering ones’ intelligence for resisting Russia in an intention to join with NATO or any west sided advantage are not so.

The United States is familiar with the brains of Ukrainian nuclear developers. He had already foreseen Putin’s outrage in Russia early (only Biden predicted it early in the evidence). That means they don’t trust Ukraine even if they take it in (rather the opposite). The United States should destroy Russia. (but there are many countries that are in trouble)
The loss of the United States crushing Russia is that Russia will not be able to buy weapons from the United States. But it can be managed through other countries such as Mexico and Australia. Moreover, the United States is the only country in the world that can manage without any trade. But if all European nations are no longer supplied with energy from Russia, the euro is also dangerous.

I ethically deny Putin and Zelensky. But Russian soldiers are also pathetic. They just do it at the behest of their boss. If you disobey orders and refuse to shoot or torture civilians, you will be shot dead. In the future, healing of PTSD of former Russian soldiers will become a major social problem in postwar processing. Russian citizens are the same as Ukrainian citizens.

A Russian soldier appeared in front of the tank and waved at the camera for media coverage. That would be the psychology of ordinary soldiers. They are killing civilians according to orders. And I’m sure I don’t know that it has been thoroughly criticized by international public opinion. That is war. You accidentally shoot or rape your allies. All that remains is the disappointment of both parties.

(Irregularly to be coninued)

Apr. 15th. 2022

Appendix; There are two types of citizens in the world. One is that you only have to follow the territory rules to which you belong. On the other hand, I understand that, but overall, I think that the citizens who think that they need a critical look at the territorial rules to which they belong. I’m always the latter, but when I have to obey, I obey the former, but sometimes I don’t. You can’t change your way of life.