Since the principle of democracy relies heavily on majority voting and is aggregated, it is easy to invisible the thoughts and ideas of individual citizens while advocating justice in some way and relying on rational relativism. The fascism of the number of logics that crushes is rampant. The lives and human rights of the victims of the Blood Festival, which depend on a large number of citizens who believe it is justice and do not doubt it, can easily be ignored.

For example, the human rights of citizens who are forced to give in due to dictatorship are not considered. In other words, there is a flaw in democracy's excessive relativism. If only candid democracy covered the world, perhaps only dictatorship would cover the world, and communism alone would cover the world. Probabloy each not so distinct state could be embodied. What is important is the feelings of well-being of individual citizens, and if only ideological correctness is pursued, a nation or community with any ideal political system will surely form a reality that is no different from dictatorship.

In other words, democracy and capitalism in set order could drag own facism and it could be so invisibly manageable, and that rationalism must squwash any citizen's own remark so easily.
That reality is only advantageous for neutrally powerful citizens taking charge of middle class people's absolute right, that must neglect only the most powerful ones' remark and any silent majority belonging one's it.

Consequently, what could be emobodied in communism dictatorship executed country's horrific autcracy could realize whole country's order so smothered and dominated by bureaucrats' power and common sense.

In fact, relativisim must be unexpectedly looked over any vigilant surveillance censorship.
Because neutrally dominant remarks constantly could evade any ctiricism, but if we leglect all unique ideas, that society consequently makes itself almost identical with dictatorshipFor example, the human rights of citizens who are forced to give in due to dictatorship are not considered. In other words, there is a flaw in democracy's excessive relativism. If only candid democracy covered the world, perhaps only dictatorship would cover the world, and communism alone would cover the world. What is important is the feelings of well-being of individual citizens, and if only ideological correctness is pursued, a nation or community with any ideal political system will surely form a reality that is no different from dictatorship dominant communism or planned economy country's soverign state.

Because, only at taking the democratic form, so easily ochlocrasism could be regarded so generously in evading any harsh criticism. Though democracy's the most dangerous nature belongs to populism's tactful pretending to be correct and just, in other words, any malicious evil-doing could be permitted only at democracy's justice and absolutely correctly regarded credibility.

However, if we prove that mechanism so correctly convincing, we must have the inspection process around what sustains democracy as the just and the most poluraly credibly seen system. To that evidenced facts, we should have so universally credibly trustworthy counter evedence.
(Irregularly to be continued)

Apr. 22nd.    2022