Good and evil don't have so clearly defiined trustworthy intepretation nor so trustworthy indication, just we according to each occasion, very personally just we judge so arbitrarily and very personally, though good and evil must be very egoistically regarded only twisted subjective ideas, you know.
Nevertheless, if we use these combinated words in terms of publicity, being public must have diverse dimentional meanings and identities, though after all, that assessing expression is either so personal, we could say, though good and evil in relevance and those pair meaning are not so easily comprehended items nor the objects to understand.

In other words, originally, these pair notional identity is actually very nasty to make our mind clear to anybody.
These set ordinarily could be thought as some religiously relevant tradisional indication to us, at any religion.
And that interpretation is not so false nor illusion, but at the same time, we use these set good and evil in very assorted occasions.

Nevertheless, to good, we are having very ambiguous but dimultaneously so clear one image and to bad we have the same judgement.

Simply, when we have some dialogue or conversation with any other one, in one indication around talking topic, to one situation, when we have some good or evil in assessment, we just focus on only that matter and to that subject, we usually have a mind for regarding it as good or evil and to that premised context, we usually not that thing could be assessed as evil or good.

Though, if that habit is the most standard method for thinking mutually, after all, good and evil are just conversation's content and context dependent own arbitrary index or so.
However, in deeply equipped ideas or view around own life on our mind, eventually evil is just only what we can never accept nor like in own publicly regarded idea arround what should be the correct matter to us.

Then, consequently, if we think its pair in personal dimension or public one, after all, just subjectively thought their pair in own mind must never be excluded.
In other words, except religious holy script concern matters, generally in fact, good and evil are just very personally picturable items and that our mind's feature or inclination must never be denied in this quesitonable context.

In our own surviving reality, after all, evil to us could have been fixed so ordinarily.
And to it, we can certainly switch the idea so totally, possibly, but we can hardly be able to swtich our own personality so easily.
Though, necessarily no matter kind of method for analyzing these matters, we'd just arrive at own subjective judging standard.

Though, in acknowledging these daily facts, eventually in world at least at our mind judging dimension, there are no good nor evil so perfectly, only that conclusion could be deduced.
Necessarily that deduction must have own induction around introducing that conclusion, and that process must mean so much for us all.

Ultimately, in world, at least at absolutely interpretable index, perfect good and perfect evil must never exist, and only to us, each outcome, each the sole given fact and nature and phenomenally appearing aspect and reality could be provided to us, in other words, only these so simply but simultaneously so cruel plain turh must be laid on this debatable context.

Otherwise, that so at a stretch seen so empty, that sensible assessed thing could be to us being, or spatially given truth.

In other words, as the matter which transcedes any good and evil, we can have some clearly debatable truth, and that truth's feature or signified absolute index could be so simply absolute presence, in other case, existence, otherwise, so genuinely being aspect, to these things, I can never find fittest word, so far, anyway, that simplicity which must transcede everything with good and evil must be some so far unidentified absolutely merely sole truth.

And, otherwise, that merely simple truth could have outputted both being, space and time, that very hugely extended, but synchronically very common and ordinary truth unexpectedly is not so easily goten in mind so consciously, and the thing must evidence that we are extremely rely on only words' regulatory kind of definitive signified habit in mind.

Yes, we are never free toward any regulatory analyzable mind index, not being into only being abiding dimensional thought and action, because we are alive surviving carnal world and unless we die, we'd never escape from that dilemma.

Thus, in conclusion, we can have next so simply formulated form.

VERY BUSY JUDGEMENT in SOCIETY

WE are obliged to REGARD each thing in GOOD or EVIL

Nevertheless, that SUBSTANCE must LEAVE US only AMBIGUITY.

Eventually, only next detached idea could be outputted.

SIMPLY, PLAINLY everything is there as it is, and that must be NOT REPLACED REALITY.
And to some extent, that could be interpreted not by theism but atheism, but probably both religions could have only INCOMPLETE or IMPERFECTION around making us convinced.

Then, eventually upper all world appearance with transceded things as being and us as our mind and idea for outputting good and evil, next very minimized relevance.

Our mind, idea, interpreting act, or so ⇨ Simply "US"   (Necessarily it incluse I, my, you, your) 

AND

Being, presence, existence, environment, good and evil in assessing mind, in other words, these all are just externally OUTPUTTED REALITY at least to us.
That must be BEING, as what externally we can confirm as index, though, ULTIMATELY,

US   and   BEING

And to it, even TIME must be included, that simply dragged truth must be made, so necessarily and naturally. TIME must enter into US and BEING.

                       US and BEING
                                on
              TIME running in REALITY

(Irreugularly to be continued)

May. 7th.    2022