The reason for abstaining us from fixing our own ultimate aim too fast must consist in what we change its nature in time running.

However, that truth otherwise means that nothing could mamage around our mind setting goal and positive feasibility.

Against that question, we could respond like next.

That is what we essentially have mutual hostile completely different dispositions around anything including constitution or so.

That is what we have very switchable nature and not that one.

Additionally, that nature's domain and content has perhaps difference as human's nature diversity.

That could be relevant with expression type's diversity.

Biological constitution's personal difference could have own reason to make us human social own character's diversity.

But that could be difficult to prove on scientific reason.

However, that difficulty's presence rather evidences that we merely could never gotten more convincing certainty abiding around articulating our more universal truth at which we all depend on.

Meanwhile, against it, we could have objection that the kind of suggestion and newly made proposal must be unnecessary negative satanic seduction.

But that opinion could have extremely our unnecessary dependence to dualistic idea keeping.

Anyway, that exemplified matter must be the proof of our considerable scheme's own persistence of habitual convention around objectivity. In other words, our scientific reason must be based on duality abiding own objectivity. And the freedom from our convention is too hard to practice.

Because our exact practice must depend on universality of success and failure in so simple dualistic judgment.

However, is it truly absolutely authorized our norm or the most trustworthy criterion to us and our future?

(Irregularly to be continued)

June  3rd.  2022