Fundamentally, human can write only what writing one can believe and regard correct. Because human's brain only can work according to what the brain owner can believe.

Though, no matter what form the writing one could opt, no matter what genre the one opts, basicly, written thing is absolutely completed just depending on writing one's true idea.

And rather only that thing's notice is the never forgotten and the must to keep in mind for any writer.

Why we can articulate that the truth must be proved only by what any written sentences have been read and interpreted must have been nothing but being the most credible reason that any earnestly learning one must have no reason to read and have enlightened any fake message nor not worthwhile thing to read.

Though, in human world, only the sentences written by the only earnestly actuated and motivated one in writing must have been read, and learnt by any latter one who appeared after author whom sentences are read.

These truth must indicate only one so simple truth that only universally trustworthy assets as written legacy must have been read by people came after the writer whose sentences have had been read by many readers.

In human world, only what can talk, tell the truth to anyone who tries to read can be read and thought as the asset to be analyzed.

Why we can define and articulate must have no reason but that only truth can make any reader try to read for thinking something so usefully.

Probably, human must be impressed only by the simplest and plainly correct content no matter by whom the sentences could have been written.

And any other reason must never be corresponded to that reason.

And written thing's the most integrally indispensable reason to be great worthwhile at reading and referring must never discriminate writing one's identity.

And the last condition must be the most trustworthy indication or index as criterion to evaluate assessment around opting the sentences to be read and interpreted.

Because written sentences to be read must have only simple reason nothing but any authority's plain neglecting and no opting around writer's concrete identity.

And that judgment is the most important must rely on what regards written sentences must consist in only written content never the writing one's identity nor personality.

That's why questioning what shold be the sentences must consist in the content's value not depending the author's identity, though essentially, written sentences assessment must be one of ethics, or ethical integrity.

(Irregularly to be continued)

June 5th.   2022

Appendix; This time, mainly I mentioned the subject of reading stance for studying one, and that must be caused from the truth that the writing one must know the truth that only one who knows reading reason for human must be able to make sentences to convince any reader.