Alive ones' world makes us only profit abiding ethics necessarily, any other thing which invalidates profit must be excluded.

Then after all, prayer to all departed could be regarded so piously, in taking us have confession around our ever done all sins, as own responsibility.

All departed implicitly could be thought as sacrificed ones for all alive ones by anyone, you know.

Because only to all alive ones who could survive long ages, life cyclic issue by itself could become so problematic and even stalemate is obliged to be made.

Though, religiously, anytime deceased ones are the goodness and alive ones are all just evil.

Alive ones even if with so pure mind as long as they all have mind wanting to survive so long, it's just along with evil.

New Testament says to us that in John. Words by themselves are protocol for us as language users, words are just proposition for all alive ones who survive world, and these mean our consciousness that we all to some extent are evil, these either mean bitter advise and testimony to our awareness that we all are evil.

What we have no truth that we all are sinners is the worst dishonest attitude for the ones of us who are conscious about our own evil.

In fact, God, universe and world for us which were created by Him are all appearance which could be signified and told by words.

Materials' composite either could be signified with words as one world.

Time and space in relevance is not exception, gene for life either.

Nowadays' AI managing society is composed with eventually words nature, that must be made with programming language what New Testament says to us is God's prophetic story, you know, though consequently our all reality will never derail that law.

Debating the things presence or credibility does never mean to us.

Our given direction and where we are heading for must change nothing to us. Because we re given only surviving our world on own road.

Our own lives only gotten through all so precious lives in near being lost, in other words, we all are anytime on hem at being as creature. Sacrifices are never rare.

What sustains all happiness is nothing but unhappiness.

Yes, to it, anybody could agree nevertheless nobody wants to offer the one's own happiness only for making other all happy.

Thereby, moreover we have to admit our own selfish evil.

Though, in the end, all being is nothing but evil, we have to admit that fact.

Being originates in God in terms of our mind, not physical dimensional analysis( latter is composed scientific cognition and that subjective stance ). Ethically only He transcends good and evil.

What could go beyond good and evil physically is only being and nothing in pair as so typically simple dualism.

Nevertheless, nothing could never have been comprehended like being for us.

Nevertheless again, anybody to some extent could infer that identity of nothing consistently is featured as so abstract and hardly be pictured only through some precious matter and situation caused from some object's absence.

In other words, nothing means what we could never scheme in mind as concretly except propositional context. The identified abstract nature is decisive, though rarely accountable issue is pictured in mind, even if we are not professional public accountant.

Consequently, nothing is derived from only notional comprehension, though at least when we have concretely serious problem in life, except so roughly pictured occasion, concept of nothing is useless.

Meanwhile, poetry thing must include sentiment, ordinarily except so genius ones with Byron, Limbaugh, Ginsberg or so.

If that necessary nature could be taken into account for our very concrete problem, we usually could not read and appreciate poetries, though, that problematic thing's solution is never completely opened, for the first time, we have a time to contact reading poetries except cultural background educated ones. Only for them, poetry was never that abstract nature product at appreciation, they must never read, appreciate them.

And once gotten these mind process, anybody gets to be attracted only by metaphysically own complicated masterpieces. However, that complicated nature is unexpectedly so simple, e.g. with nothing as specific concept.

But at least at first moment, as mind movable traffic moment, generally, from the beginning, words by themselves could have included sentiment, couldn't it?

Talking about past is certainly sentimemtal topic or so, but that consciousness must be more concrete, because for older ones, left lifetime is very limited.

Rather, sentiment must come up to us when we recover our mind spiritually and mentally positively.

In fact, consistently, past could never be present only at memory and past data referring possible reality must make us calmed down to our introspective mind picturing time for us.

Nevertheless, we deal with any now present distress, and necessarily, we'd never admit the personality by the one who has no past. Amnesia must have some each personally specific traumatized past incident causing reason, but for each person, very individually so own cause and reason must be immanent.

However, extremely leaning on only past data to some extent in our reality, stems us from having our own reality progressed.

Though, any trial and bravery are made up for our mind's positively regarded and motivated advancing mimdset, not leaning on only memory abiding inactive mind and idea.

(Irregularly to be continued)

June 9th. 2019 written in Japanese, and additionally included reviewed and reformed parts, translated and added another content at June 17th.  2022