World thing after all comes under reciprocal mutual indifferent distancing. That typical reality is easily comprehended by division between the floating exchange rate and planned economy.

And actually we can never allege the idea that now our world attending divisional reality must never have any reformable possibility, nevertheless, simultaneously, probably if we succeed only capitalism's own floating exchange rate dominant united world order could have another incompleteness, though consequently original form must bounce back to mutually divisional reality dominant world.

With these suppositive world example, we'd be obliged to conclude that if our suppositively interpreted world could have been so naturally correct truth, our world must have been made from the beginning, nevertheless our world for so long period had only mutually divisional world's entire appearance, though, any supposed propositional question is just futile. 

These logical inference could be outputted, there.

However, is that inference so correct, or so persuasive to our reason and essential idea for convincing our reason and ideological justice abiding thought?

To the question, for the present, those two mutually different conclusions are both to some extent convincing and simultaneously incomplete for convincing us, or satisfying us so completely.

E.g. social classified modus ponens was obviously at former half of 20century, relatively had fixed. 

However, gradually, according to social value's diversely developed transition, classified members switch had gotten so frequent, nevertheless, approaching to century's expiration, gradually, super managers in US had fixed highest classes member's appearance and with these members' fixation, any other lower class ones' heavily switchable reality also had gotten being fixed.

That simply two classes divided fixation given society was established in these two decades.

Lower class majority people's world had been established, relatively easily promotion and class descendant reality must have fixed to be easily at both transition of up and down, in other words, except privileged limited class fixed members, any other classified people must have been given so actuated incentive for working, in this term, systematically, and substantially, toward communism adopthng planned economy countries, liberalism economics adopting countries are fundamentally not so different, only at east sided camp, high class bureaucrats' members and their power is strictly fixed, that exception is indicated.

Meantime, as never necessarily as John Lennon sang "Imagine", actually, our world must never embodied no religion, no military world, far from it, rather very powerful military technological advancement and scientific armful technology in synergism with transmitting technological development was perfectly promoted by west and east both camps.

That was correct interpretation around these two decades.

That army reality's undoing impossibility must mean that rather any world's everlasting peace ideology must have been sustained that realization's impossibility and in awareness, we all can look for each occasionally ideal concessive and compromising reciprocity among west and east camps and neutral in-between camps.

In other words, in west camp, in whole lifetime, only not privileged class ones, easily having a chance to come back only in switching view and nature according to each generation's feature. Only that previously set advantage is publicly displayed to ordinary citizens.

But they can never be guaranteed not as stable as planned economy east camp countries, on the other hand, east camp countries' citizens are easily taken not so having ups and downs income switchable realities.

And, in terms of military presence and army stationing reality, to any country's government, only saving never abusing unnecessary armful execution in smartly dealt reciprocal mutual concession.

Though, consequently, at any sided camp, only not essential argument and debate should be abstained from practicing to each other must be the only guaranteed deterrent around preventing from executing nuclear weapons usage into the reality.

To us, as long as we have mutually very different historical and cultural, political contexts, only evading perfectly genuine ideally regarded mutually universally ideological scheme must be the sole dodging method for having no miserable war in hostility.

In other words, to any side, only expediently each occasionally better transaction and agreement, or acceptance to hostility attending country's emphasis, questing no perfectly ideal method must be the unnecessary best strategy or potential mindset for each other, you know.

(Irregularly to be continued)

June 24th.  2022