Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Ambivalent Personality a.

Between and among mutually trustworthy human relation, or relationship(s), anybody needs no pretending nor previously schemed conspicuous attitude or so.


At least at mutually very credibly jointed friendship, nobody could need to take self bluffing or unnecessarily modestly contact to the one, because the case in which anybody could take indifferently contacting stance around keeping fellowship or doing conversation or so, to the one who wants to keep company with or frankly contacting, the aimed one for the one must be at precautionary stance at having frank friendship or fellowship, in other words, simply and plainly, the one dislike the one who wants frank friendship or so to the one.


That thing must be so serious at the field in which mutually both one must keep strict bond or so e.g. at universe's researching project or space station's long period co-staying, but only privately taken daily not official nor likelihood acquiring formal necessity abiding case has no need to persue reformable containing way, so mutually.


In general, specifically at mutually not so well keeping necessary fellowship, mutually both ones should and can take appropriate distance together, and if that thing coule have been done so mutually smartly in taking no intervention, mutually not so seriously done traumatized spiritually wounded mind must never be left to each one's memory and brain by itself.


At one sided one, some skeptical mind to another, evasively taken roundabout denial and declination to familiarly approaching one must be done by skepticism of approached one.


In final, keeping friendship or not to anybody is decisively arbitrarily to each other.


Nevertheless, to anybody, nobody must be friendly nor have friendship, though finally, to anybody, friendship is arbitrarily opted and not officially necessary relationships must be forgiven. And that whimsical nature is forgiven at only free time and holiday dependent free option of human contact and officially and work situational necessity are originally mutually very different.


Though, in the end, only at never delectable indispensable relevance, we usually take very intentionally playing role to anyone in social field and that gathering members number was increased, anyone must pretend to be another personality and as much as possible, anybody must pretend to be very intentionally and arbitrarily so "good" and "modest" person so almost half flatteringly to any other one so formally and officially, that intentional and arbitrary switch must belong to TPO abiding our own socially surviving wisdom and nobody must show everything around own remark nor view to any social matter.


Necessarily, according to the person, very modestly never showing own mind is the best friendship or fellowship, on the other hand, to anybody at necessity of contacting, only frank and outspoken conversation or communication can be demanded by some unique character accompanying one could be present.


Blunt attitude is frequently witnessed at any formally necessary procedurally taken social site, that must be some socially necessary courtesy to any publicly relevant one, especially at municipal hall or hospital or so, only economizing time loss for taking good deal for social order.


That example rather coule be regarded so kind and affectionate at evaluating opportunity for introspective our daily thought so personally.


Taking all those daily exampled cases account, these things' analytical tendency is to some extent sociologically approachable or psychologically done so, we'd judge so reasonably so far.


Consequently, we anytime unconsciously, discern our each character at the occasion in front of parents as children, in front of children, as a parent, in front of spouse as different gender partner(otherwise same gender one), though, necessarily, to any kind of other one, we must have mutually discriminating character and own attitude, according to degree of our personal

trust to each one.


At those all cases, we'd articulate that we all are morn or less, perfectly multiply playing and pretending own masquerade attending own social player, at some time so meekly obeying man or woman for the boss, at another time, so defiantly aggressive critic to any antagonizing person or organization.


We anytime only to our own personality we can have clear consciousness and awareness, completely unified and integrated, but occasionally, at some unexpected emergency, we could have rarely shown split personal some violent ambivalence.


At the matter of fact, the rating ones for our personality are constantly publicly regarded society in general by itself, and that very serious split to anybody mustwbe our all sharing and distributed very serious reality, sometimes so tragically and occasionally very comically.


(Irregularly to be continued)




Aug. 17th.  2022