Basically, any arbitrarily categorized Logical notional interpretable element is perfectly abstracted, though between each logically interpretable notion's element's identified significance must have no neutral territory.   

Because if the kind of territory was allowed to have ambiguous territory, that schemed analyzed each significance must collapse own identified reason.

In other words, at any schemed ideas, being never given an unnecessary neutral territory is the only admittable circumstance. And if once that neutral nature given chance was acknowledged, any notionally scheming necessity as analysis abiding Logical appropriateness must be lost and stolen at illogical logic's acknowledging must be invited.

In other words, never recognizing any in-between and ambiguously neutral zone, as rejection of these attitude must be the orthodox attitude and manner of L ogical extent analysis and initial setting's significance.

And that mindset is the most basic premise of Logical analysis and its brainstorming's significance.

(Irregularly continued)

Nov. 6th.  2022

Appendix; If we persistently could like to have some not applicably schemed elemental nature in inquiry, we should set another standard as never former schemed each elemental unit. Probably if we could have fantasy specifically at in-between territory, that occasion's the most effective soluble method or scheming must be just another term's, another schemed alalyzable item's discovery is the best solution.