At ⑮, I memtioned that ages difdifference around way of thinking in religion and belief Luther's days and ours. Nevertheless I don't think that interpretation around Luther and his belief in analysis should not be left to only objective view as scientific rationalized investigation. Becaus issue of belief should not need help with scientic objectivism.

Then let's go back again to his description.

He continuously claimed Christianity's truth in which he tried to make any popularity's mind to get back.

"Vow, specifically it which could be regarded as everlastingly runs must be abolished and first, we should make anyone go back to vow of baptism. Not that will be impossible, at least we should advise them not to vow so easily. Additionally we should not make them vow. Because relieving vow from them is so difficult. Though that mission should be executed so carefully as much as we can. We'd accomplished many things which we could never do without vow, with baptism. But if we could do at least one mission, it'd satisfy our missionary duties so enough."

After the description, he wrote the carnally negligence around misbelieving holy Bible description's misunderstanding stance in real society. New Testament's misinterpretation's claim was his main engagement really known Luther's achievement. But his manifesting texts sentences are very poetically expressed. E. g. before his this text was written in 1520, at 1917, he publicized "Disputatio pro declaratione virtutis indulgentiarum"(1517), in D. Martin Luthers Werke, Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Weimarer A usgabe=WA), Abt. 1, Bd. 1, S. 233-238.

An excerpt

4

〔Now present〕As long as hating myself(it's genuinely immanent acknowledgement, but) could sustain, namely, until entering in heaven, sin remains.

6

The Pope could never forgive anything as sin except declaring sin is forgiven by God, otherwise acknowledging it. And except forgiving own left claiming items to himself (though these items could be looked over, sin still remains consequently), he'd never forgive any kind of sin.

7

God did never forgive anybody's sin, if the one is not following priest of God's deputy so piously.

16

Hell, purgatory, heaven, the difference of those are corresponding with despair, approaching to it, accuracy to salvation.

(Irregularly continued)

These so advent nature abiding own jewelry tasty glittering words are so penetrating for interpreting our own life's so hard times and own annoyance torture days.

Because these mindful problems are all never objectively arbitrarily controllable items. All these are (like mentioning at another this essay series ) not scientific rationalism abiding own objectively regarded the third person view which must be impossible for conceiving our own mind. 

Because all those judgement is only reliant on our "OWN SUBJECTIVE QUESTION".

Because the one who lies own mind must never convince any other one's mind so convincingly.

ANYBODY WANTS TO HAVE HOLY NIGHT in the end of the year.

(Irregularly continued)

Dec. 2nd.,  3rd.    2022

Appendix; This article mentioning "subjectivity" is signified with what only the one could know true mind of the one as Analytical philosophy or legal philosophy accompanying own propositional significance.