Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Communicative Aspect we can Confirm ⑲

Any human circle must have own unit's nature, though human circle is constantly dependent on any member's own circumstance and that totalled course is necessarily so subjective personally.


E.g. Phenomenology circle must consis in our human presence's own environmental involvement research through objective observation. They try to our mind and environmental factors in reciprocal functioning oxn relevance abiding entire human's own ecosystem.


Mind, action and our physiological activity's nature investigation around own interactive functioned mechanism research.


Meanwhile, Analytical Philosophy intends to analyze our mind's immanence. That internal research means very socially signified own idea, notion reliant our brain's idea itself's objectivity is the most integral proposition and circle research's essence.


Religion means more merely humanized idea's schemed own mindful motivating alalysis.

Though e.g. Christianity's own proposition consists in Old and New Testament described items' own interpretable Analytical inspecting outputting own our mindful decision and the same comrades solidarity abiding own immanence confirmation.



With these all elemental materials' premised conditions make us have next digesting formulated diagram of mutually conceptual relevance.


❇️ I dare to compare Religion with Phenomenology.


PHENOMENOLOGY'S ONE APPLICABLE NATURE

 

PSYCHIATRIC REMEDY, SPIRITUAL ANALYSIS


THOSE ALL ESSENCE DEPENDS ON "OBJECTIVISM"


Though, those fundamental course relies on INTENDING TO TAKE PART IN SCIENCE.


❇️ On the other hand, Religion is like next.


RELIGION BELIEF is PURELY "SUBJECT"(not -ism)


Because BELIEF IS NOT PUBLICIZED STANCE ABIDING "IMMANENCE" ATTACHED RATHER "IMMANENCE" ABIDING "POLITICALLY INTENTIONAL ACTION".


These all mutually composed mechanism means like next.


EXTERNAL POLITICS ⇒ CRITICISM (In terms of its theory abiding nature)


Meanwhile,  


INTERNAL POLITICS ⇒ RELIGIOUS MIND'S BELIEF


Taking all those theories into account, Luther's text in question analysis will go on to next stage.


"God toward misbelieving converted ones made Him converted. How did God punish ingreat's ungrateful attitude to lean on plea unnecessarily and arrogance? That was making those ones incapable to keep their own pleas, otherwise made it so heavy burden as labor and made them who survive according to only plea incapable to escape from their vicious circle action habit. Ghost by them is not making God belive in it, they had been obliged to stay there. Though, they even in following justice, could never reach to it everlastingly."


These words mean that we are not the being at jumping at the gun for hurrying own knowing our Christianity's just truth and its truth consists in our spontaneous concerning with God's mercy and only not doubting it is the most integral idea. Because we all were once baptized by that Christianity's idea.

And it means our true "SPONTANEOUS SUBJECT FOR CHRISTIANS."


Our believers' own stance belongs to THOSE

GOD'S IDEA IS OUR OWN EMBODIED REALITY.

THAT'S WHAT "BAPTISM" ' S OWN IDENTITY.

And it means that "WE ARE INCARNATED."



By the way, pscychiatrist Bin Kimura (木村敏, 1931-2021) descrived like next about his dealing "DEPRESSION".🔯


"The most frequently coming out main themes' subject is not to mention of that "irretrievable health conditioned MIND'S AURA SUBJECT", "irretrievable economic conditioned POVERTY SUBJECT" and, "irretrievable ethical conditioned RESPONSIBLE SINNER'S SUBJECT"."


Necessarily the last item is Luther's articulating own BAPTISM GIVEN "OUR SUBJECT".


In other words, if we are conscious about being baptized at Christianity, we have to be subjective at thinking, seing, regarding all what we meet, encounter and do make all things for us, so necessarily.


Subsequently Luther continues like next.


"I deny that one person with the one's will try to plead personally nor oppose it. I'd like to smear pleading. But that could be regulated at public life mode, to it, I'd oppose. According to own challenging the risks in unidentified outputting fruit to us is free for person what I'd never admit, but that pleading could be demanded at public life and recommended, these trials must seduce pure minded soul owners unnecessarily. At any rate plea is ceremonial rule, human's instruction, hypothesis, these actions must breach Christians' life way. Through baptism churches should be free from these ideas. Though Christians are never detained except God's Torah. Additionally, in Bible, sample of plea does not exist. Specifically, all lifetime chastity, obedience, life in poverty in pleading doesn't exist in it. What Bible doesn't sample is usually dangerous. They should new be recommended. They should not to be applied to general people's public life. Certainly people do at own risks in knowing so is forgiven. Holy spirit's karma is given to a few people as subject, applying it as life paradigm or manner is impossible."


There, Luther obviously discriminate our IMMANENT NECESSITY and FORMALIZED REALITY. That his ethical subjective idea is very indispensably integral.


Because as through Kimura's text in Phenomenology sais, RESPONSIBLE SINNER'S SUBJECT means just only justified that pureness only through baptism. And the premise means Luther's enlightening own Protestant's subject. And it either means his own criticism a gainst Catholicism.


In other words, Luther's ideas were origin of Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith and John Maynard Keynes.


(Irregularly continued)




Dec. 13th.  2022




🔯 自己・あいだ・時間 Myself, Between, Time. Phenomenological psychological pathology. Chikuma shobou(筑摩書房)