Words definition certainly is very ambiguous. Each vocabulary's definition is not done in one absolutely indicative in absolute fixation. Because with socially signified each practical value and our consciousness must never be stably at the same appearance, far from it, any site's own standing circumstance is anytime switchable and mutual words' relevant aspect and each vocabulary's given role are never perfectly defined nor interpreted so consistently.

None the less, when we talk or pick up some specified historical objects with historically important person, some historical big event or so could be comprehended so unexpected extent relatively done to us.

Though necessarily, Luther's own achievement must be to almost extent interpreted so appropriately.

Because his teaching and enlightening thing was continued to hand over to each next generation and it means history.

And today, his religion historical signifying identity will be inspected so carefully.

There, I'd address this article to some another books reference and quotation for make Luther's achievememt so clearly, it'd be so long sentences as its volume, please put up with that roundabout.

Literature doctorate scholar Osam Komaki (小牧治 1913ー2000）mentioned at his long essay "Kant"(カントー人と思想⑮ 清水書院 1967）like next.

"German's invasion to East Preuβen was one meant as Christianity's spread. Konisberg was also Christianity's spread's foothold. According to pioneered degree of this land in increase of German immegrant, Christianity was spread.

Afterward, in 16c. according to merge of Protestantism, East Preuβen became joining with one of Protestantism, Pietismus(Pietism) at spreading. Pietismus was (omission) giving course to be modest and believable to God from the bottom of mind, and following to His words. From the beginning, against Cathoricism as formally ceremony and churches could be regarded so vital, specifically immanent mindful belief was emphasized. Catholicism had churches abiding functions God's serving and the class (monarchy) were preceded. Though down to the earth(professional) lives were one degree lower ones than Churches' ones and these were only method for sustaining churches. Additionally, general ones who were serving carnally relevant lives were lower than Pastors. Against these, Luther as Protestantism's origin regarded that only earnest belief to God so immanently as supreme course for Christians. He emphasized immanence mind must have than form. As far as he did so, people had no difference and profession had no gap at degree nor class. He saw gift by God and mission given by God rather in daily working. Though he saw the duty for Christians and its essence in profession we generally engage us.

However, Luther was taking stance at enlightening belief to God in replacing the claim into worldly various situations as regarded what we must obey as no-conditioned submitting piously. Given profession, given status, given order..., those all were God's Providence(His Will, His Charity) though everybody had to accept those joyfully and submit those so obediently at no condition.

Pietismus which claimed obediently serving God in modest ideologically must have attended L uther tasty course was regarded so intensified moreover.

There East Prussia's given thing in reality was human put in the order and rank system, merchant's union, handcraft industry union and village common lives abiding conventional basis attending lives to them, huge farms owning feudal lord serving daily lives, and sovereignty forced by greatly enlightening monarch in submitting and operated honor.

We can imagine there was accepting honestly and modestly and strictly follow their realities for Pietists' appearance.

They merely had consciousness around mankind's sins though so modestly, endeavor given profession, the Konisberg's residents ( government officials, employees, maister(foremen), craftsmen, apprentice, etc.), we'd picture.

Kant's family religious sect was very pious Pietists in deep believing. That could have been very diligently modest at steadily honert foreman's family. Infantile Kant was influenced by extremely pious Pietist's mother. That pious and honest Kant's moralistic nature was nurtured in this family. And its background was working as his neatly serious and became diligently facing actuating Kant's moral theory's basis.

Nevertheless, questionably confirmation necessary thing is lik next. Konisberg and the Eastern Prussia's spreading Pietism gave birth to the spirits to make an effort of engaging them in jobs. But according to that they got them into actual professional life so honestly and diligently on belief to God's Providence, their lif attitude was never heading for reforming given realities. Rather out of date real situation was preserved so negatively conservatively. That is intrinsically differentiated truth against Calvinism which had spread to W estern Europe at symmetrical relevance. Calvinism gazed at similarly engagement toward profession in comprehending God's gift. Nevertheless simultaneously rationalized realities so strictly (particularly professional job course) and in outputting product, they watched God's glory. And they tried to see the proof of what they were selected by God. With these stance of Calvinistic Protestantists, Occidental modernized civil society, in other words, Capitalism was heading for establishing."

Komaki's interesting is to some extent over expression tasty summary we'd regard, but Luther's own identified feature was smartly analyzed in the essay.

In other words, French Philosophy enlightenment ideas are certainly having constantly own radicalism as  Jean-Jacques Rousseau or so necessarily has the tendency.

If more directly we could paraphrase the term, certainly Luther's stance or own idea is reinterpreted as one of severe stoicism( I immediately associate them with Amish). Meanwhile, calvin's stance or so associates 20century's Woodsock generation ones socially taking spiritual stance.

If we consciously take all these stances' exampling into Luther's text in question, otherwise how should  we comprehend next Luther's sentences subsequently from 22?

"(Abbreviation) Life mode according to pleading that thing is not found reason in the New Testament. That is merely originating in the Pope's own personal great letter deriving thing and that is concocted hypocrisy there as if it is truth. Additionally there claimed that ordinary Christians' life could be despised. No reason to abolish pleading, with its conspiracy, belief and baptism are regarded so meaningless, rather only karma is done so integral. Applauding pleading must call that harm. We should know that just that hypocrisy's absence must never make applaud pleading. Today, the ones who could never applaud karma than abby and sect's karma are almost none.(Abbreviation)"

Upper Luther's ideas are certainly, like Osamu Komaki's description, he shows very severe criticism to light idea, though his course and ideology must never forgive liberty ideat. And as Komaki claims Luther's idea is too stoic to output resilient wayout from confused deadlocked situation.

Nevertheless, great Jew pedigree philosophical thinker Jacques Derrida described like next.（Quoted from his MEMORIES D'AVEUGLE ーL' autoportrait et autres ruines)

"Another witness, John makes us reminiscence that truth and light comes from Jesus Christ. Judaists expels that light, because healed blind must have never believed that the one was jurt blind. Evangelion could be interpreted as blindness's anamnesis. Dipatched words as judging or salvating them, good news identified with Evangelion constantly arrives at blindness. This advent emerges along "Eyeball Story", and it draws that eyesight's internal division. "And Jesus said, "For judgement I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be made blind." /Then some of Pharisees who were with Him heard these words, and said to Himas"Are we blind also?"/ Jesus said to them, "If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, "We see!Therefore your sins remain." "

The last his quotation is not to mention of "John 9.39". 

Upper Derrida quoting parts shows either Luther's own diligently earnest mind for contributing profession around maintaining own purely reasoned life to us.

(Irregularly continued)

Dec. 27th.   2022

Appendix; At next chance to mentioning of Luther's stance and religious sect course, I'd like to take up Luke's so famous "Parable of Prodigal Son" for positively criticizing Luther's incomplete nature of belief sustaining mindset as my own subject.