Around "Disputatio pro declaratione virtutis indulgentiarum" I merely very abbreviated so plainly. But actually the text is not so easily captures by our superficial deliberative effort. Because he must have critically serious alive or dead optional decision.

Thus, around to it, only the last chapter with be quoted here.

20〔95〕

Christians, as we'd checked, must believe in, than guaranteeing peacefulness, rather breaking through several difficulties for entering in heaven.

If we can comprehend the words' meaning so at composed mind, Luke's so popular story around prodigal son, we'd probably make out upper Luther's very integrally essential words significance so well.

For knowing the essence Luther wanted to claim at the last chapter at the text, aroumd what I mentioned at 23,  the last quotation from Derrida text, John 9.18's claimed message is going on for analysis for the first time.

"And Jesus said, "For judgement I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be blind."

This part's claim is relatively easily understandable to any reader. That means abled one's own conceit makes them own conceit and consequently the own carelessness.

Though anytime wanting one could be modest and enriched one could be easily arrogant. And that truth wi be taken into account for Luke's "The Parable of the Lost Son" should be quoted there.

"Then he said:"A certain man had two sons. And younger of them said to his father, 'Father, give me the portion of goods that fail to me.' So he divided to them has livelihood. A nd not many days after, the younger son gathered all together, journey to a far country, and to there wasted his possessions with prodigal living. But when he spent all, there arouse a severe famine in that land, and he begant to be in want. Then he went and joined himself to a citizen of that country, and he sent him into him field to feed swine. And he would gradly have filled his stomach with the pods that the swine ate, and no one gave him anything.

 But when he came to himself, he said, "How many of my father's hired servants have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger! I will arise and go tomy father, and will say to him, "I have sinned against heaven and before you, and I am no longer worthy to be callefd your son. Make me like one one of your hired servants."

And he arose and came to his father. But when he was still a great way off, his father saw him and had compassion, and ran and fell on his neck and kissed him. And the son said to him, 'Father, I have sinned against heaven and in your sight and no longer worthy to be called your son.'

But the father said to his servants, 'Bring out of the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet. And bring the fatted calf here and kill it, and let us eat and be merry.

Now his older son was in the field. And as he came and drew near to the house, he heard music and dancing. So he called one of the servants and asked what these things meant. And he said to him, "Your brother has killed the fatted calf.'

But he was angry and would not go in. Therefore his father came out and pleaded with him. So he answered and said to his father, 'Lo these many years I have been serving you; I never transgressed your comnandment at any time; and yet you never gave me a young goat, that I might make merry with my friends. But as soon as this son of yours came, who has devoured your livelihood with harlots, you killed the fatted calf for him.

And he said to him, 'Son, you are always with me, and all that I have is yours. It was dead and is alive again, and was lost and its found.'"

There expressed left son's irritated mind must be caused from that his obediently serving father attending own privileged positing consciousness. Toward it, once going and coming back son had no calculation to anything, he only acted according to his idea and no advantageous gaining account in doing no flattering even to his father.

And this Parable storyline based own emphasis resembles Luther's criticism to carnally attached Christian's greed and his reformable ideological criteria's justification as the sole.

In other words, his gist meant what only imnanently actuated mind will drag God's gifting advent.Though subsequent paragraphs said like next.

"Like these, karma by monks and Cathoric priests is so noble but according to God's viewing, simple labor for cultivating fields and house keeping women's karma must match with their it. Because they have devoid of understanding that God must judge all through belief, they only have tie idea around it, and belonging to abby and sect, becoming priest are never recommended items, alleged to deny it, I wanna speak so. "JEREMIAH"5.3 "O Lord, are not Your eyes on the truth? /You have stricken them. / But they have not grieved; Ben Sirra 32 ; 23 Belive attending your mind holding in your all karma. Because this is keeping God's order. Far from it, you all should recollect female slaves and ordinary slaves abiding family concern subtle job is extremely acceptable rather than karmas by monks and Cathoric priests in fast. What makes us disregarding the defects of the system itself must be belief's absence."

He subsequently mentioned the examples to make upper mentioning convincing.

As you read and interpret their all sentences' essence, prodigal son's leaving and going back in welcomed by his father with generocity around his own fair idea. Greed root eradicating intention must be equipped at his advice to another son.

Luther's own only immanent belief to God theory must share his interpreting to the parts as Luke's prodigal son(Lost son) obviously. His Religion Reformation ideology is based on denial to regulatory formalism and genuinely recommend merely subjective belief's pious and solemn selfish "ego" 's abandonment at deeply interpreted our these days' contemporary society surviving wisdom (that solidarity must, otherwise ought to mean essential peaceful idea).

(Irregularly continued)

Dec. 29th.    2022