Very important fact we have to keep on mind is our own gap between only nature law abiding materialistic organized things and our mind abiding own idea additionarily that nature interacting sensing dependent our life view accompanying thing are usually dealt as mutually obviously nature gap inserted.

And necessarily, this series addressing propositional interpreting thing has to belong to and consist of our own communicative methodized factual truths.

Originarily religion thing must have own beginning significance around that obvious gap between mere materials and us. In other words, that kind of background must have composed us to approach own life and death in own relevantly positioning.

If we had no death at our own mutually completely divided and mutually physically separably remote to each other, that mutually at another body's meaning must have been perfectly differentiated nature thing to us and nature world.

In other words, because we have mutually each independent death, we'd made us own religion and each ceremony abiding own notion around life and between life and death in symmetry.

Michael Henri was mentioning that we as own personally tangible alive thing is own, showing in relative comparison, his reference from Hideggar's indication that table is never touches table by table-self(as that must be adjacent to the wall of put table room just accidentally contacting another surface to each other, that is not subjectively so, only materially objectively so).❇️〈from "INCARNATION"〉

However that indicating degree is only introductory step.

Mainly seen so important descriptions are like next.

" Intentionality is making some specified object revealed as that kind of arbitrary displaying. Revelation is here object's revealing. And the thing is definitely so at one doubled significance. In other words, revealed thing is object as the term, that's truth, and also revealed thing is object, though being revealed way 

object as revealing as included in revealed thing is specified to the object as revealing way at made possible, that's truth. Object's own revealing appearance, namely to us, every visualized vistality is appearing there, distancing remotely, the sort of working." 

Otherwise, like next.

"(Omission) if only at arbitrary thing is previously displayed that to us, we'd be able to talk around that as the truth, method's reduced to phenomenological true object is necessarily relevant with language. As necessary as the truth, everything we'd narrate arbitrarily opted thing and possibly do so and every formulatable every narration is obeying this condition we'd never ignore."

And he described at another part like Emmanuel Levinus like next.

"The name is called by a poet, these exampled revelations are not managing any seat in several objects surrounding me, that must reach to appearance in a kind of absence, that's like one dream's several illusions as if that's any flowering at the point of death. Certainly these are revealing as the things poets' words' giving birth, even if being revealed, at the term of absence at existentiality, it's absence. At last, Phenomenology's principle can be narrated like next. As much as revealing as revealed, either not existential thing is there."

And he alleged like next too.

"Husserl alleges that this alive Cogitatio and its existential specified nature has no particular importance. Because after all, Phenomenology is not roman as not narrating Pierre and Evet's story telling intended."

These descriptions are never so easy to understand so instantly.

However, if we try to interpret those so carefully, next thing must be "revealed".

That must be that "ANY OUR WORLD'S COGNITIVELY KNOWN THING is definitely UNIVERSALLY MADE THROUGH OUR (MIND'S)OWN NOTIONAL COGNITIVE IDEA IN MIND.

His Levinus, Husserl's dogmatized ideas quotation means that like next to us.

WE CAPTURE ANY GOD'S REVELATION ONLY THROUGH OUR OWN MIND'S COGNITION (Because we, at any perceptive moment even to any natural phenomenon, know and see through our natural scientific principle abiding idea.)

Because WE ALL ARE OBSERVERS AS "TO MAKE ANY PERCEPTIVE PHENOMENAL THINGS CONVERTED into ORDINARY WORDS". (That means that we know through anything around what we'd learnt through language communication at first home and schools or so as education facilities.)

And totally, if we regard our constantly grappling own Luther's text, going back to ordinary context, next shown Luther's subsequent parts from former 25 must be appropriately interpretable like next.

"At this term, I'd like to indicate the Pope's two big mistakes.

The first is that the Pope at excempting that pleading pretends to be authorized than any other Christian. Where can we find, like that, so misbelieving one's daily mistaking rather than his wrongdoings? If the Pope can excempt pleading, any assistant cleric otherwise any kind of neighbor one could excempt pleading, even to own it so possibly. However, if the neighbors could not do that, like them, the Pope could never do so too around displaying own authority, you know. In fact, from where did he get that authority? Is that key's authorized power? But that given power is according to Mathew (since 18-15)( ❇️a.)only to anyone, that'd be effective. Not only but also, the Pope and his fellows are even if they confess that pleading is given only by God who has authorized power, they even cheet poor ones, instructing that they could give them what only God is able to do and consequently they perish them so essentially, don't they? Bulla apostolica's "Pleading and its Redemption" mentioning part as logical analysis has absurdly once upon a time in Tolah Exodus(13-13-34-20)'s(❇️b.) written as the same of donkey's first child was replaced with a sheep, pleading is possibly done. Was he trying to emphasize that donkey's first baby and his ordering pleading are identically dealt? Otherwise if Lord could have convert donkey into sheep in His setting, in Tolah, the identically dealt, even to G od, the Pope as a human has not only to human law but also to God's Tolah, does he have power, doesn't he? Probably not the Pope, truly but donkey which was transformed to the Pope must have drafted the order. Just that is foolish and misbelieving thing."

Upper description is to some extent so ironically written seriously taken but intellectually arranged own sophisticated derogatory toned script. 

At some remarkably ironically taken his smart criticism strategy is obviously interpreted by also contemporary social habitants of us too.

And in conclusion, Henri's text definitively featured ideological idea must match that Luther's own interpretable ideas. And additionally, Phenomenology's own basis caused from Husserl was definitely inhered also by Hegel. And his prerence was handed over from already mentioned Kant, necessarily their origin was including either Luther(necessarily not only him).

Additionally, educational our social systematic own mechanism for human society's stability was probably caused from Holy Bible's own comprehensive order's establishing very older past than only before Christ, moreover fore ancient survival eras had some similarity with Henri's "INCARNATION"'s own emphasis around Rhetrics abiding own tradition. We can assume these associable inference. And that researching potentially conceivable idea must never be easily neglected by us taking into account of any these days' own academic circle's reconstructive necessary historical circumstances.

This time I'd have pause at this chapter. But afterward, this proposal I mentioned in conclusion will progress more and more to highly degree.

At next occasion to address to analyzing, more precisely Rhetrics abiding own academic stance or so will be dealt by me.

(Irregularly continued)

Jan. 3rd.     2023

❇️a. 18. 15～

Dealing with a Sinning Brother

15 Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that 'by the month of two or three witnesses every word may be established. And if he refuges even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and tax collector. 

Assuredly, I say to you, whatever you bind on earth will be loosed in heaven.

Again I say to you that if two of you agree on earth by My Father in heaven. For where two or three are gathered together in My name, I am there in the midst of them.

The Parable of the Unforgiving Servant

Then Peter came to Him and said, "Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Up to seven times?"

   Jesus said to him, "I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven. Therefore the kingdom of heaven is like a certain king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. And when he had begun to settle accounts, one was brought to him who owed him ten thousand talents. 

But he was not able to pay, his master comnanded that he be sold, with his wife and children and all that he had, and that payment be made. The servant therefore fell down before him, saying, "Master, have patient with me, and I will pay you all. Then the master of that servant was moved with compassion, released him, and forgive him a debt. 

But servant went out and found one of his fellow servants who owed him, and forgave him that the servant went out and found one of his fellow servants who owed him and took him by the throat, saying, 'Pay me what you owe! o he fellow servant fell down at his feet and begged him, saying, 'have patience with me, and I will pay you all. 

 And he would not, but went and threw him into prison till he should pay the debt. So when his fellow servants saw what had been done. Then his master, after he had called him, said to him, 'You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you begged me. hould you not also have had compassion on your fellow servant, just as I had pity on you? And his master was angry, and delivered him to the torturers until he should pay all that was due to him.

 So My heavenly Father also will do to you if each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother his trespasses."

 

❇️b. (The Law of the Firstborn)

But every firstborn of a donkey you shall redeem with a lamb; and if you will not redeem it, then you shall break its neck. And all the firstborn of man among your sons you shall redeem. 

cf.

continued to next,

(So it shall be, when your son asks you in time to come, saying,  'What is this?' that you shall say to him, 'By strength of hand the LORD brought us out of Egypt, out of the house of bomdage. And it came to pass, when Pharao was stubborn about letting us go, that the Lord kill all the firstborn of beast; Therefore I sacrifice to the Lord all males that open womb, but all the firstborn of my sons I redeem, 'it shall be as a sign on your hand and as frontlets between your eyes, for by strength of hand the Lord brought us out of Egypt.")