Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

1 and 0 ✳️ Reapproval 1.

Now happening thing must be for the first time coming to us. But ever happened thing must have been so at that time. This truth could be replaced with afterward made equation. 


If now already done and never confirmatory thing can be recollected, it could be NN, 


Though, necessarily, past is P, now is N, thus, being present could be Be, 


P(Be) = NN, but it is never the same with originally none as (N),  


NN ≠ (N), 


And (N) is originally none, but NN is ever Be, though


NN = P (Be), but


(N) ≠ NN, (N) =(Be)
But at our own cognition, even (N) could be immanently (Be), it could be made through


One definitive relevance (0,1)


Necessarily, even (N) is notionally (Be), 


Though, if notion could be imminently (Be), 


 (N) ≠ (Be)


Though, that makes Infinite Regress. Because 


(N) ≠ (Be) , (N) =(Be)


That means, in other words,


(N) ≠ (Be), (N) =(Be)


 in general CTRD, but notionally ¬ CTRD, 


Though, necessarily, 


CTRD =¬ CTRD, 


thus it can be Infinite Regress. 


Additionally, structurally at equation, NN and (N) are together ∃, 


Though, intrinsically, physically N and notionally (Be) are at


{(N), NN, (Be)}


Though, very simply, 0, 1 mutually present to each other, though



¬ CTRD{(0,1), (0=1), (0 ≠ 1)}



After all, all those notionally 1=0 could be possible. 


(Irregularly continued)




Dec. 8th.     2023