Blog for Nameless-Value

novel, essay, poetry, criticism, diary

Necessity is Accidental Nature’s Own Justification i. Reason of it 1.

Anyway, to us, ever happening thing, but now only recollection draggable matters are universally shared at least for the ones who stayed there, you know. 


And what that ever existing, happening thing can be necessity is our own consensus, because e.g. at the site we four were staying and something was witnessed by us, and surely now already that thing is none, namely it was diffused, but if we try to doubt that ever done thing, it signifies with our own sensation and perception are only illusion, though we need to certify the matter as necessity, indeed.


In other words, to us, perception must be the identity which we all were once gathered at someplace else, and to it, through our all shared witnessing thing, we can have certain confidence that we were there, though without it, we'd only roam about what we should believe in. 


Thus, perception recognition means just identifying our presence as the tripper for time running riding. Though intrinsically to us, perceptive cognitive recollection means evidencing to our own present fact. To us, reapproval means own ethically, morally signified admission, execusing and own recognition around our own fucluty. Without it, we could never advance even only one next step. If all past could be precipitated into nothing in darkness, we all could be fallen into darkness. 


Approval means just knowing any once perceived cognitive content was never only illusion, that approval to our own past stoppable time. That is our proof of once alive and staying there. 


Though, to us, any scenery memory and recollectively regenerated mind function must be signified with our own presence approval. Being proof, evidencing. 


Though, essentially, there must be some our switchable mind from fact into belief as conviction. Our own shareable conviction. And its significance means convertible mind devise from logical extent belief into ethical extent one. 


Though, essentially we are hoping to have own consensus around ever witnessing truth in no doubt. Though our own language from the beginning, that functioned truth confirmable necessity makes us have own mutual consensus. That could be made in equation like next. 


If at own past we could witness something, to the fact, we can hope to share together to any other one. Necessarily very affirmative actuated minded time, so. That could be like next. Hope could be H, Past could be P, witnessing act could be W, and perception could be percept, though PSP, and knowing in mutual reapproval could be K


PW = K(PSP→P)
 


And, if we all admit ever existing, happening and made things at own consensus, the idea that those all were illusion is definitely wrong. And it can be made to next equation.
In other words, if when we doubt ever made thing, all one except us were at consensus, my own skeptical idea must be wrong. That can be equated like next. If Contradiction is CTRD, and "to truth skeptical" could be SKP, 


Even if we have SKP, except I, all ones are at consensus, my idea is CTRD, though ever occurred thing could be EO, everybody could be EV, my idea could be MI,


SKP(PO) = CTRD must be proved, 


through next equation.


If EV (PO), SKP(PO) = CTRD


Though, necessarily, 


SKP(PSP) = CTRD



(Irregularly continued)




Dec. 8th.      2023