If we try to difine the most credible humanism so strictly, only never having the idea must have the most credible idea, that answer probably will be left to us as the best answer. 

What makes us conclude so is probably derived from the truth that any ethnicity, typed individual must have each own justice, creed or any value, as in frank, on the earth, we have no united and totally seen correct at least "the true and credible absolutely correct idea", because in any ethnicity abiding unit, each own subjectively regarded own the sole correctness in mind to each other must be made naturally and necessarily. 

Consequently, to us, only, on the earth, no any absolutely seen correct truth must be present, thinking so must be the most appropriately valid idea, that answer must be outputted.

And, probably any message can be partially universal to anybody, and even one so splendid message can be only partially effective to send or to be given. Thus, no matter what one very wonderful message can be effective partially to anybody and the each distinctively shared mind can accept partially wonderful value or sense. 

In other words, in circle for us, each very own sense can be made, installed and shared, though after all, no perfectly universal message can be present, the idea must be the sole relatively more natural idea to anybody, probably. 

And, in frank, those ideas are never in frank conservative, but rather very simply natural idea. Though, necessarily even the concept of humanism can provide us some unidentified mistificable impression as well.

(Irregularly continued)

Apr. 17th.   2024