Triplism is my creating words. Why I'd done it is caused from my some dubious impression to dualism, that must have managed all machinery systems with any kind of computer, sensing devices. Then I just was outputting suggestion with my new words, and it means either that slider rule with conceptually knowledgeable elements with the first already systemetized data or regulation as deterministic law. And second is just presuming data number calculated from our experiment and inspection. However that number consequently must be gapped with finally outputted data that will eventuall turn out. 

In other words, this world law or regulatory systematized mechanism must be under control with these triple steps as analyzed law as triplism, I suggested so.

And very important essence must be slider rule adjusting performance. And essentially it must rely on consistently time current necessity with past settling or setting things and now plausibly judged as correct not dangerous attempt's legistimacy, and last is obviosly the unidentified but at another occasion must be identified outputted data, then these things consistently make transition from past to present, from present to future, and consistently these things on slider rule lawfully. If that thing could be adopted to providence, either it could never be just false, because we are yet known to these ultimately set law.

In other words, anytime at unidentified process, these slider rule adopted transiting must be kept going on. 

Presumptively mind holding number e.g. at index of economics or so must be 
both at our known number and that thing's vague adopted range to generally realized condition. And if we really set our object for the present, we practice with that and at newly tried experiment or so, we have some presumptive outcome at practicing process, that must be second stage. And at the last stage, we afterward knowing outcome outputted with the indicated number as result showing thing. With the condition practiced with the third stage, we for the present must get the one cycle done. 
Eventually our any try and error must be on this process. And consistently we only are obliged to subscribe these three stepping's process as procedure as somewhat we could define slider rule, and these interpretation could revise all things' objective view at a strech as if we set the God's look, necessarily it must be needed to us as a mind for theology, or ethics of it, but simutaneously we need either cool view with time and transiting slider law tasty absolutely confirmable reality. 

With these repetitious process, we must get newly supposed objective number and the truth with these number indicating evidence making first stage the second, doing it the third so everlastingly.

Dec. 29th. 2020

Memorandum: For the time being, this titled theme was ending here, but at another occasion, this time suggesting slider law must be addressed with my upcoming future debate, you know!