By the way, first I want to suppose one question. That is somewhat which is never ＋nor −. What is it?
That must be to some extent our notion, or notional somewhat, but at lest it is never complete nothing nor zero(0). Because rather we all move and are moved just with it. Then probalby it must be indicator of mind. If we guide it into mathematics, we could change radically mathematical commonsense and not it but also, at least economics and politics could be don e so.
Uncertainty must be regarded as not having stability and not past thing but at the matter of fact, our mind holding and what to make our mind convince and what makes us being convinced to mind. Then it rather manages all our conceptual understandings with wish, hope, understanding, formal interpretation. if it was absent from our mind, our mind itself could never move, work, function itself.

We anytime act, then we have motion, impulse as driving force to do something, and will or intention, with these we can practice, execute, do all things. Hence, this time must have us being attracted to our mind holding own time, but for anybody at own mind, not so hard gap must never be present, unless each one belongs to each diffrent species .
In other words, each one has each different date, and time for having motion with a premise as motional somewhat of motivating mind or so.

That must be detonator, necessarily it must relate either with climax driving and fulfilling. These are similar and fundamentally at the same principle at own mind, in terms of physiologically, cognitive scientifically.

It must be actuating mind to next act for us.

Probably, Heidegger and McCtaggard at older epoch than Heideggermust have pictured God viewer look and its embodying time. And Heideggar must have called it original nature. And McCtaggard must have set it as serially continuing time system. But actually we all carrying time to having motional mind riping time as so internal moment for our life with job mission.

Uncertainty was mede of our anxiety at the moment beforehand of starting, doing something. And afterward of starting it, it was made of dissatisfaction in doing it, and being aware of process's not so well doing.

In other words, uncertainty  means just mind, then it must be transcendent beyond and over time system. Because it must be at now, but simultaneously now is consistently so vaguer, because now is what was future a little bit earlier but now, it's now, but immediately it would be past not making me afford to write it. Nevertheless, principly it could head for only future so easily. Then, these two diffrent typed of uncertainty must be analyzed or made to diagram like next.

Past own circumstance〇　　　〇wish and hope to future
　　　　　　　　　　　　〇
　　　　　　　　　One moment(date)✽
　　　　　　　　　　　　⇓
　　　　　　　　　　Starting it
Starting moment’s idea〇　　　〇Introspective mind to be left at dissatisfaction　
                                           〇
✽In terms of definition, now has various range, but this time, It should be date time.

And if we finish own work and we're personally satisfied so much, tha time's mind could be like next.
                                        to lefy, for the present,
                                        fulfilling satisfaction gotten
                                              ⇧
         With first stage's 
         setback in            〇     〇　 〇 A little recess could be necessary in easy                                 satisfaction                                                     emotion            
         in awareness,               〇
         and learning something                         
　　                             

By the way, somewhat not +nor − 0, but simultaneously not plural number nor not 1, but simultaneously possible to be them all, that thing must be transcendent over anything.
That must be mind, then necessarily it means either what to decide now at each occasion.
Then, necessarily it must be, in tems of cognitive criteion, itmust be either reality nor not reality.

However, at least we make issue focused on our integrally holding "one motion" could be given to have total vision, a dynamism must be given to diagram.

　〇　〇　　　　〇　〇　〇　　　〇〇〇〇　　  〇〇〇〇〇　　　〇〇〇〇　⇨　　　　          〇　　　⇨　　   〇　　　⇨　　〇　　⇨　　    〇         ⇨           〇

⇨　〇　〇　〇　⇨　〇　〇  ⇨    〇
　　　　〇                     〇              〇

 At very summarized interpretation, set movement at corresponding relation and combination could be displayed. The kind of collateral shifting's scheme is needed at mathematic either, this is my opinion. 

At next debate, this time's last diagram's explicative more precise content could be anticipated now. 　
(to be continued)

Jan. 24th. 2021