ムラゴン ホーム
Simply, phenomenology must depend on objectivity. In other words, it intends to analyze totalized socially relevant human presence in philosophical view originally anybody inherently has in mind and through that analyzed outcome, our missioned mainly important subject could be outputted. That presumption and methodizing must be there.
On the other hand, analytical philosophy must depend on subjectivity. Though its first aim and original premise is intended to make the ones who are engaged in it so being interested in theologically indwelling own idea's analysis.
Though, necessarily, phenomenology is based on objective view relevant with natural science, meanwhile, analytical philosophy is based on subjective view relevant with religious creed.
Thus, consequently, analytical philosophy must head for precise words' interpreting and analysis of that conceiving nature in mind.Though its nature is very familiar with theology.
Simply, phenomenology takes stance that for the present totalized summary is important and that must be necessary. Thus it indends to practically socially conceivable idea and its utility in emphasis.
Meantime, analytical philosophy must rely on our privately conceivable mind's analysis, necessarily it could have tendency around comprehension toward what we have subjectivity in resonable answering and delition to that tasty mind's trouble. Thereby analytical philosophy is familiar with theology.
Simply, phenomenology is inclined to have indication directly to our mind for smooting our daily routine, on the other hand, analytical philosophy is inclined to indirectly indicate in meditatable mind's creation.
Nevertheless, eventually we could have not solve any objectivity and subjectivity in discrimination. Because phenomenology must decide to have indication subjectivity is never solved in analysis and it should not be done.
Meanwhile, analytical philosophy must decide to have the idea that subjectivity must never be dealt so ambiguously, because we could survive according to that subjective mind.
Then, in conclusion, after all, phenomenology must be so useful and adavantageous to create governing wisdom to any personal citizen, though it'd be so practical.
On the other hand, analytical philosophy must claim that any useful nor advantageous idea should be dealt or regard so skeptical.
Though, eventually phenomenology is based on positively affirmative around social consciousness and dutiful mind in justice.
On the other hand, analytical phlosophy must have mind and tendency around rejecting any affirmative idea and skepticism toward any powerful idea, though necessarily it intends to negative stance.
In the end, anybody at the matter of fact, both feelings and emotional time in daily life.
And we'd never decide which stance is more important nor the best completed soluvable perfection.
Just, I at the matter of fact, have some abandonment around perfect both academic attitude's synthesis, nevetheless, if we appropriately comprehend both mutually differentiated stance and tendency, according to our own mind state or mentality and spiritual mode, we'd use both of them so practically in regarding our own mind.
Thereby, I'd like to utilize phenomenology for socially necessary subjective anaysis, and do analytical philosophy for solving our mind's obligedly suffering from confused and mess-up in daily life.
Because, actually we have according to each occasional time, both mutually completely symmetrical mental mode. At very positively regarding mindful situation makes us comprehend phenomenology in dealing with everything in daily life, and I really use this method in summary to our daily life reality's depiction.
On the other hand, I have also meditatable mind time and occasion, and if the moment comes up to me, I try to have an idea according to analytical philosophy.
And necessarily, if anybody could have certain academic stance, both academic studies could never had in compatibility. However, I have stance to create literature with mainly poetry creating and essay writing, though toward their analysis and summary phenomenologic viewpoint could be useful.
On the other hand, I also create novel series, though for advancement and output totalized claimable its theme, analytical philosophy's method is useful, nevertheless, at my case, rather novel's theme's stance must be relevant with religious creed to us, though for arranging my ideas in my brain, phenomenologic alleging stance(by the way, its alleging method is anytime necessarily so objective) is useful at least when I am confused.
Nevertheless, occasionally, there would be the case rather keeping so confusion and mess-up in mind could be useful, that case either exists in our daily life, thus in that time, also analytical philosophy is either necessary probalby to anyone.(Of course, professional adacemist is not taking that stance)
However, at the matter of fact, essay thing, poetry thing could be at least to me, both so enigmatic, and novel thing is at least to me, not fixed form is never taken to my creating stance, though, necessarily I otherwise unconscously use both poetry and essay, only taking advantage of depicting wonderful novel, that conclusion could be induced there.
However, to me, that in induction, another deduction, or deducing truth could be seen found in mind, and that matter must be relevant with otherwise familiar with subjectivity and objectivity must have mutually inseparably very profoundly complicated relevance and either so ambivalently destined hostile but strangely mutually understandable relevance.
Namely, in fact, eventually liking emotion, or favorable mind could not be so straightly postive in possibilty around either skeptically mindfulness, or not solvable comical, but a little bit seriously taken mind's inner conflict.
By the way, this time very complicated development is done at this article, that necessity must be integral probalby for arranging so summarized and simply claiming message or sentences in creation like so short poem.
Because ultimately verse and prose could never precisely separable. And phenomenology is unconsiously taking stance at alleging so defiantly and that must be so subjective attirude, meanwhile, analytical philosophy must be so objecgive attitude only around concluding summary, because necessarily it has skeptical stance around conclusion's outputting.
Though, necessarily at this decisive necessity, analytical philosophy must take stance that conclusion is unnecessary at taking at leat at life truth's inquirable solution. Though, necessarily analytical philosophy could have so ambiguously daringly mistfying attitude.
And sometimes, if we have positive regard to analytical philosophy in that truth, we must have very smooth and easy carrying around verse's creation.
Nevertheless, anytime that verse creative mind stance could never be kept in mind for us, and more practically dealt attitude could be demanded, at the occasion, we must need philosophical easy alleging.
Though, necessarily phenonenonogy must regard dynamic defiance and summrized objectivity as correct, meanwhile when we have mentally gloomy and so inactively not ambitious time either, at the time, analytical philosophy's immnently indwelling religious mind's analysis is so effective, we could say, so generally.
However, necessarily that remark is probably also just so subjective idea around my creating stance and study attitude, I'd say so either....
Mar. 12th. 2022