If you are in so tough situation, to whom can you call? First, for you?

The sort of second person for you is so precious for you, but that thing is so complicated and really so hard, unexpectedly, anybody is so busy in securing the one so first, never having any powerful helping mind, that’s so normal thing to anyone.

Coz second person can be set only with minimal plural gathering either for you, the one you are asking too. Thus if you have at least one so precious first second person so spiritually and mentally, you are so lucky and intrinsically you are so richer psychologically.
Is it, if you have the one, irreplaceable thing for you, inherently?
In addition to it, either you can frequently ask somebody, you must thank that one so honestly, but if you have no one who can do so for you, you need not to be anxious, if you have some sure mind to help somebody, you would be helped by the one or somebody who looks at your act, or so.

Theistic credo cultural zone’s ones have one Lord, as the one to call ‘You’ for you, for anyone, but truly to whom should we privately call “you”, that is a question.

Of course, you must never do so rigidly, you can be so easy in all acts you should do as your creed or you want to do.
All what you make up your mind anytime depends on your true mind, you might do all along with it, no other thing is not necessary for you.

Just only to whom we want to call “you” is the sole question for us so personally, really, we couldn’t let go, coz only it means our life as human.

No matter what sort of occasion, if we make plural meeting to somebody at each moment, we’d necessarily have a chance to call “You” but if you are questioned who is your most preciously believable one whom you can call you, so naturally never pretending so to do? How can you reply that question?

No problem, if you can’t do so, you have the time for you, and in your feeling so important time, you could reply yourself by your doing by yourself, it must be the truth and just it must come to you.

You as second person is very assorted, even rogues, outcasts, accomplices or so, can have the sort of calling, from somebody, it’s so true law, even distorted co-dependent relevant one, either.

All human relevance could never be perfection, only that factual truth must mean our evidence to be one of human.

At the matter of fact, we usually unconsciously discern so expediently and so wisely unconsciously, any calling as “You” from other calling with him or her, or them.

But even if we can select the sole one whom we can call you, so easily. So stark, can you have a chance to consider that issue?
Have you ever questioned it to your mind?
If you’ve never done, so once you can try it, as you like.

Actually, what is you? What’s the very best “You” for you now or then?
What does that mean to you, as that question to yourself or so to the other one for you?

Or, what do you think it means to us, either?

Is it what we should focus on the sole one?
Or, is it what we should switch that object to do so?
Or, is it obliged to be substituted as the object to call “you” or so?

Otherwise, is there completely another the most persuasive propositional one?

Hear all what I ask you with your deep inside of your mind!
(Mar. 10th. 16th. 2020)